Photo removed off facebook. This lady is nuts!

[KiDD]

http://news.aol.com/article/facebook-policy-angers-nursing-moms/291439?icid=200100397x1216605652x1201034624


Who the hell would put a picture like that on their facebook.

[Jelly]

Who the hell would put a picture like that on their facebook.
So that she has an excuse to throw a hissy-fit when it gets removed. Facebook have the right to remove any image they see as inappropriate, as is in the EULA. She doesn't have a leg to stand on, so brings the media in to it.

Ugh, people like this make me semi-rage.

Edit: OH JESUS QUICK MOVE TO TECH FOLDER BEFORE KORNMA--

[Dwood]

this isn't tech worthy. btw korn would probly do it anyways based on the topic of discussion.

[Masterz1337]

Why wiuld you want to even show yourself breastfeeding on facebook? It's not hot or attractive, or makes you look cool.

[Heathen]

How can she even start anything over this?

The rules state no nudity.

[LinkandKvel]

needs less baby and moar tit

[supersniper]

needs less baby and moar ***AHAHAHA!
But seriously how dumb can you be... it's a public profile website, little kids use it (middle school and up) and she posts her boob in her childs mouth...
Wow just think what the child will say when it finds out what it's mother did...

[Masterz1337]

It's not even nudity. I know girls who post pics who just hold their arm across their tits when they put up a topless pic, or post like teasing pics of them topless with their back towards the camera. Nothing happens to them. As much as I like the pics, it's more inapropriate than the mother breast feeding her kid in that pic.

[nooBBooze]

I almost went into /b/ mode. God damn you, internet!

[teh lag]

1. Why the fuck would you want to post a picture like that?
2. Who the fuck would get offended by a picture like that? There's no nipple, and it's not something I can find a logical reason for wanting to shelter children from. Oh no, our children must be protected from the evils of motherhood!

...Though #1 seems to have exempted this from the normal laws of logic. Plenty of idiocy to go around here.

[MetKiller Joe]

She's an idiot. Another million or so of those on the internet.

[Hotrod]

It's not even nudity. I know girls who post pics who just hold their arm across their tits when they put up a topless pic, or post like teasing pics of them topless with their back towards the camera. Nothing happens to them. As much as I like the pics, it's more inapropriate than the mother breast feeding her kid in that pic.
Agreed, there is nothing technically wrong with those pictures that are put up. It's just another occasion that people take to complain about something.

[Terry]

Firstly, you can restrict your profile to your friends. Secondly, even if she didn't no "little kid" has the right to be snooping on her profile anyway.

And let's face it, its breast feeding. It's a beautiful thing for a mother, and she probably just wanted to share it. Granted you may not want to see it, but no one asked you to and it's her freaking profile anyway.

I don't blame facebook for removing it though. It is there site, and they even state that they have the right to remove images as they see fit. It's also pretty stupid to complain about it as well and even worse to bring media attention. But I must say, I've seen some nudity on facebook and no one seems to care, so I can only really see this as people going "OH NO BREASTFEEDING iS EVILL!!!!!!!!!G-GOD NO!".

Suck it up.

[ICEE]

I say that its not really about the child feeding, its just that she has exposed breasts. If facebooks rules define that as obscene, then it is obscene. Tough crap for her.

[FRain]

Why is this nuts? It's breast feeding? Who gives a shit? Besides, if you breast feed, you'll make smarter babies. If you don't you'll make bafoons, that you can run up to in high-school and tip them over, and they'll lay there and not know what the hell to do.

Also: you get sick less. I was breast fed I get sick for about 2 weeks a year. I know people who are gone from school sick at least once a week.

It's a natural thing, I see nothing offensive about it.

[Dwood]

I say that its not really about the child feeding, its just that she has exposed breasts. If facebooks rules define that as obscene, then it is obscene. Tough crap for her.

End of Discussion. She does not meet the EULA therefore Facebook has a right to remove it and she needs to get over it.

If you want a site where you can post such things make your own lady.

[StankBacon]

23, that ugly, and already has 2 kids... what the fuck.

[FRain]

I took a look at the pic. Theres hardly even 1/2 of her boob showing. That's not even offensive.

[KiLLa]

Well I don't take pictures of me pissing and post them...
Sure it's natural, sure some might find it beautiful, but it's just not appropriate either way..
How do you know there aren't people out there with breast feeding festishes?
It is the internet..
All of them agreed to the EULA that states they can remove them as they see fit.
You can't complain after you basically sign a contract..

That's like complaining you have to be quiet in an apartment..

[Sel]

Why wiuld you want to even show yourself breastfeeding on facebook? It's not hot or attractive, or makes you look cool.

Its a cry for attention from some fat lady whose all likeyoyoyoyoyoyo i got laid

[supersniper]

Well I don't take pictures of me pissing and post them...
Sure it's natural, sure some might find it beautiful, but it's just not appropriate either way..
How do you know there aren't people out there with breast feeding festishes?
It is the internet..
All of them agreed to the EULA that states they can remove them as they see fit.
You can't complain after you basically sign a contract..

That's like complaining you have to be quiet in an apartment..Agreed, just because it's natural doesn't mean everybody is comfortable with it. When she first signed up to facebook she agreed to follow the EULA that was provided when registration occurred.

[dark57]

Theres really nothing showing but I rather not be searching for one of my friends there and a lady with the same name breast feeding come up :|

[DarkHalo003]

I honestly find this funny because someone thinks they could have posted the picture on FB and gotten away with it. Sure, it's a natural way for a mother to feed their child, but that does not mean they should express it via the internet. The internet sucks with this violation of EULA crap. It's like putting a pie on the ground and telling your dog not to eat it, when you know damn well he doesn't know what the hell you're saying and does so anyways. People violate their freedom of posting pictures. Enough said on my part.

[Phopojijo]

Sure, she may have thought it a good idea at the time... Facebook didn't... she should have dropped it there o.O

[cheezdue]

I think they should do something else other than just trying to put pictures of themselves breastfeeding their baby.

[Syuusuke]

2. Who the fuck would get offended by a picture like that? There's no nipple, and it's not something I can find a logical reason for wanting to shelter children from. Oh no, our children must be protected from the evils of motherhood!

Dude babies and titsuckers would be offended!!!

[cheezdue]

Dude babies and titsuckers would be offended!!!

Haha lol.

[Bodzilla]

End of Discussion. She does not meet the EULA therefore Facebook has a right to remove it and she needs to get over it.

If you want a site where you can post such things make your own lady.
no ones debating whether they can remove the pictures, but whether they should.

Breast Feeding is not only natural, it's necessary. moms shouldn't have to hide from the public eye to do something that doesn't harm anyone else while being extremely beneficial to the child.

people need to grow up and stop trying to shelter people, because the end results of all this sheltering "THINK OF THE CHILDREN" bullshit thats been happening for far too long is a generation of sheltered, inexperienced, conditioned retards that dont deserve to breath, let alone reproduce.

[Xetsuei]

Wow what a freak. Who the fuck puts a picture of them breastfeeding their kid on Facebook? Why would you even want to do it? "yo chek mi out ima feedin mah babay"

[CN3089]

Wow what a freak. Who the fuck puts a picture of them breastfeeding their kid on Facebook? Why would you even want to do it? "yo chek mi out ima feedin mah babay"
yeah man real people starve their babies and then post pics of their baby's exposed ribcage

[SnaFuBAR]

stop clownin on anna nichole, cn

[CN3089]

stop clownin on anna nichole, cn
vhttp://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c251/CN3089/Emoticons/awesome.pngv


ps there is nothing wrong with breastfeeding in public you big babbies http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c251/CN3089/Emoticons/emot-colbert.gif

[Xetsuei]

I'm not saying it's wrong, but why would you post a picture of it on Facebook? It's completely pointless.

[CN3089]

I'm not saying it's wrong, but why would you post a picture of it on Facebook? It's completely pointless.

yes women should be ashamed of being mothers

[Xetsuei]

Not gonna reply if you're going to troll.

[n00b1n8R]

Wait, so she posted a picture of her breast feeding?
I actually had to work out what I was seeing in that image.

OH NO, PEOPLE MIGHT SEE A MOTHER NATURALLY FEEDING HER BABY HOW OUTRAGEOUS!!!

I think both sides are making a big deal about nothing, but I also think facebook was stupid to delete it in the first place. (I know, lets piss of a new mother, their renown for not making big deals about nothing! :downs:)

[DarkHalo003]

Facebook had the right to delete the photo. They're the owners. There are a lot of people who would rather not see that. Tell me, if you agree with this sort of thing, does that mean you want to see it? No, probably not. Sure, it's natural, but it's clearly a violation of the agreement you made when you joined. It's unneeded to see what you see in the pick. It's not the feeding that makes it exactly bad though; it's the boob and the reaction of those around it that FB wanted to avoid. Whether people can be mature and handle it is a different issue. It's clear that we all can't though. If anything I could point that last sentence at myself.

[Donut]

he has a point though. masters said hes seen pictures of girls on facebook who cover their breasts with their arms and take topless pictures. this woman is posting a picture of breast feeding. people do make blogs about their babies. i understand that its a violation of the EULA, but if that is the case, then why are the topless photos acceptable?
also, the fetish argument is null. some people might have a foot fetish too. should every picture containing bare feet be removed from facebook? i know thats a bit of a stretch, but the point is that it was probably for a blog of the baby
E:

Facebook had the right to delete the photo. They're the owners. There are a lot of people who would rather not see that.
i dont want to see some fat guy's blog about how many hot dogs he can eat in 30 seconds, so i dont plug "fat guy eating hotdogs" into the search bar.

[DarkHalo003]

he has a point though. masters said hes seen pictures of girls on facebook who cover their breasts with their arms and take topless pictures. this woman is posting a picture of breast feeding. people do make blogs about their babies. i understand that its a violation of the EULA, but if that is the case, then why are the topless photos acceptable?
also, the fetish argument is null. some people might have a foot fetish too. should every picture containing bare feet be removed from facebook? i know thats a bit of a stretch, but the point is that it was probably for a blog of the baby
Meh, I'm honestly tired of hearing the stretches in this. Mainly this has arisen because it's such a small case. The topless girls haven't been removed because there are either so many of them OR they are going by a technicality; I think it's the first.



i dont want to see some fat guy's blog about how many hot dogs he can eat in 30 seconds, so i dont plug "fat guy eating hotdogs" into the search bar.
Well someone brought this up so I responded. Just how things work when we see something we disagree with in a public forum.

[n00b1n8R]

I'm not saying it's wrong, but why would you post a picture of it on Facebook? It's completely pointless.
Many mothers find it a source of pride that they breast feed their baby (even for a short while) instead of bottle feeding them formulae like other mothers (read: I'M A BETTER MOTHER THAN YOU).

But really, you could just as easily make the argument "Why would you post a picture on facebook?". :downs:

Sure, it's natural, but it's clearly a violation of the agreement you made when you joined.
Where's the obscene, pornographic if sexual explicitness in the image?
JESUS FUCK THE WOMAN HAS BOOBS AND THAT BABY OF HERS IS USING THEM, GODAMN DOUBLEFUCK!
Bikini's are more obscene than that image.

[Xetsuei]

Many mothers find it a source of pride that they breast feed their baby (even for a short while) instead of bottle feeding them formulae like other mothers (read: I'M A BETTER MOTHER THAN YOU).

lmfao.

[Donut]

in addition to this photo being taken down, i am also offended at women's bathing suits because of how much leg is shown and i am offended at the olympics because i saw Michal Phelps in a speedo
oh and im offended at Oscar Mayar because they drive trucks with giant plastic hotdogs attached to them and call them "wiener mobiles"

[mech]

http://www.modacity.net/forums/images/customavatars/avatar2_6.gif

[Donut]

and im offended at tag body spray commercials because the guy gets cleaned in a sexual way by a bunch of women in bikinis and the last scene shows a close-up of a sign that says "blow dry"


...ok im done... for now

[ExAm]

Firstly, you can restrict your profile to your friends. Secondly, even if she didn't no "little kid" has the right to be snooping on her profile anyway.

And let's face it, its breast feeding. It's a beautiful thing for a mother, and she probably just wanted to share it. Granted you may not want to see it, but no one asked you to and it's her freaking profile anyway.

I don't blame facebook for removing it though. It is there site, and they even state that they have the right to remove images as they see fit. It's also pretty stupid to complain about it as well and even worse to bring media attention. But I must say, I've seen some nudity on facebook and no one seems to care, so I can only really see this as people going "OH NO BREASTFEEDING iS EVILL!!!!!!!!!G-GOD NO!".

Suck it up.
^iawtp

[DarkHalo003]

Meh, in whatever way the internet runs, it's all really crappy either way. The Internet is annoying as it is and will continue to. Might as well suck it up in the end. pun not intended

Donut, that last one made me laugh a little on the inside. Nice job.

Mech, idk wtf but that made me lol.

[StankBacon]

your all missing the point, shes a fucking dog.... thats why we don't want to see it :)

[Limited]

Interesting...My friend who works as a manager in Mc Donalds got in a sticky situation like this but in real life, a women came into his mc donalds store with a baby and started to breast feed in the middle of the store. He went up to the women and asked if she could do that in the baby changing room. She went ape she and called all her friends who have a baby and they all protested by mass breast feeding in the store.

The moral, dont piss off a women when it comes to breast feeding.


Facebook spokesman Barry Schnitt said the company's guidelines regarding exposed flesh allow most breast-feeding photos. However, Facebook draws the line at a visible nipple or areola, he said. Facebook also nixes pictures showing the gluteal cleft.

Shes pissed because something that isnt obscene or sexual, breast feeding is getting removed, while other pictures where girls are wearing pretty much nothing are getting away with it.

[Donut]

i didnt realize the picture on the aol article was the one we are talking about until a few minutes ago. that should tell you something.
there is not any exposed nipple unless aol decided to crop it, but even at that, i still cant see how any nipple would be visible

[n00b1n8R]

your all missing the point, shes a fucking dog.... thats why we don't want to see it :)
no.

[Dwood]

This thread should be locked now.

[Hunter]

Wtf. Almost every girl I know has one of those photos of them with the camera facing down their top.
The girls I know are 16-17 and younger, so they ARE under aged for that sort of stuff.

This woman is 23, she is legal for nudity, but not on face book.

But nudity is usually when you are showing your nips. There is no nipple in that picture, if they class that as nudity/inappropriate, every photo of a girl on face book should be taken of because they are always showing part of their breasts...

The photo they removed:
You might get offended by the lack of breast showing

http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g268/martynball/pic_mum.jpg

[Jelly]

But nudity is usually when you are showing your nips. There is no nipple in that picture, if they class that as nudity/inappropriate, every photo of a girl on face book should be taken of because they are always showing part of their breasts...
They'll get around to all the other people posting inappropriate stuff. They rely on the images being reported and investigated before removal, instead of using a nipple-detecting algorithm.

[Donut]

which means all those photos of partially nude girls wont get taken down because people like to look at them. amazing. this society is fucking ridiculous

[Xetsuei]

this society is fucking ridiculous

You just noticed?

:v:

[Donut]

You just noticed?

:v:
oh believe me, i noticed when i was 4 years old in preschool. girls talk, nothing happens, i say one word, i get 5 minutes on the wall

[dark57]

oh believe me, i noticed when i was 4 years old in preschool. girls talk, nothing happens, i say one word, i get 5 minutes on the wall
You wanna talk about it Donut?

[Donut]

no, i got over it
but if you really want to...

[dark57]

I didn't :saddowns:

[Limited]

Well, hunter the photo does show the bit around the nipple.

Also

she is legal for nudity
Lol great quote.

[Hunter]

I dont get it ^ xD

[TheGhost]

I've seen more inappropriate pictures than this on Facebook. Doesn't this mean that someone was looking at the photo and marked it as offensive? That's really the only way the Facebook staff could become aware of a picture that people thought was violating the EULA.

[LinkandKvel]

^yea that's what I was thinking too. Really the only way it was brought to their attention.

[n00b1n8R]

I'll be back in a few years, flagging every topless camwhore on FB, TTYL.

[Hotrod]

I'll be back in a few years, flagging every topless camwhore on FB, TTYL.
Have fun taking years staring at all those pictures;)

[SnaFuBAR]

I'll be back in a few years, flagging every topless camwhore on FB, TTYL.
zilla's profile is in trouble

[Bodzilla]

you shut your cry hole.