PDA

View Full Version : COD5 screens


343guiltymc
June 18th, 2008, 09:37 PM
http://www.gamesradar.com/ps3/call-of-duty-world-at-war/news/first-call-of-duty-world-at-war-screens/a-2008061711716279020/g-20080609145258671045
Well, at least it's better looking than COD4.
SuperSunny
June 18th, 2008, 09:56 PM
Treyarch shouldn't work on the series >< I prefer Infinity Ward. They've always had more success and an overall better game. The engine itself for COD4 (obviously being used on COD5) was damn good. It's shared, but this is going to be epic fail :(
itszutak
June 18th, 2008, 09:57 PM
...katana?

Flamethrower?

o_0
ODX
June 18th, 2008, 10:01 PM
The first thing I think of when they say they're using the 'Modern Warfare' Engine is: Can I put a Red Dot Sight on my Mosin-Nagant? I wonder what they're going to do with the Multiplayer. What I've seen, they haven't said anything about that.
Rentafence
June 18th, 2008, 10:20 PM
...katana?

Flamethrower?

o_0

World War 2 over in the pacific.
sdavis117
June 18th, 2008, 10:31 PM
Treyarch shouldn't work on the series >< I prefer Infinity Ward. They've always had more success and an overall better game. The engine itself for COD4 (obviously being used on COD5) was damn good. It's shared, but this is going to be epic fail :(

Look at the bright side. Treyarch working on CoD5 will let Infinity Ward have more time to make CoD6 an epic win.
Corndogman
June 18th, 2008, 10:42 PM
what are they switching off every game to get the games out faster?
Amit
June 18th, 2008, 10:45 PM
Look at the bright side. Treyarch working on CoD5 will let Infinity Ward have more time to make CoD6 an epic win.

ROFL. I still think that's a downside in one way or another.

IMO, I don't really see a huge difference in the graphical part of the engine other than the slightly sharper graphics and brighter (and friendlier) environments.
ExAm
June 18th, 2008, 10:48 PM
As long as I get to play Axis and slash people with the Katana, I'm happy.
Limited
June 18th, 2008, 11:02 PM
I like it. Lots of jungle/forresty bits :D
sdavis117
June 18th, 2008, 11:20 PM
I just want to play the Chinese and Russain fronts in the Pacific War.
Kornman00
June 19th, 2008, 01:37 AM
I waiting for the spoiler to be leaked that 25% through the game, a hole in the space-time fabric is made and space marines from 2488 pop out, being chased by evil stick figure aliens who are sporting Leonidas masks and have the uncontrollable urge to scream names of random sex positions.
rossmum
June 19th, 2008, 01:53 AM
Treyarch need to fuck off and let IW handle the series. And CoD6 better be a war that hasn't been fucking done yet, like Korea or the Falklands.
Kornman00
June 19th, 2008, 02:16 AM
Or the one where America whooped Australia's arse :downs:
Botolf
June 19th, 2008, 03:01 AM
Yay, red white and blue kool-aid vibes! Hell yea!
PenGuin1362
June 19th, 2008, 09:20 AM
Or the one where America whooped Australia's arse :downs:

I second this.

Finally a ww2 with awesome graphics. This may actually be fun. but srsly,
IW > Treyarch. Treyarch does need to fuck off. COD4 was epic.
SuperSunny
June 19th, 2008, 12:05 PM
Call of Duty 7: Cold War (Treyarch)

Actually I'd love to see a Call of Duty game attempting the Bay of Pigs invasion ><
DrunkenSamus
June 19th, 2008, 12:57 PM
I thought it was going to be Vietnam-ish with the jungles and such. I was hoping there would be hippies and Bob Marley...:(
Kornman00
June 19th, 2008, 12:59 PM
I'd love to see a COD game be about the call of duty. http://sa.tweek.us/emots/images/emot-george.gif
Heathen
June 19th, 2008, 05:39 PM
I waiting for the spoiler to be leaked that 25% through the game, a hole in the space-time fabric is made and space marines from 2488 pop out, being chased by evil stick figure aliens who are sporting Leonidas masks and have the uncontrollable urge to scream names of random sex positions.
Finally a similar believer! O.o
NullZero
June 19th, 2008, 07:22 PM
The future > past

Imho, I've had enough of games trying to replicate ww1/ww2 wars. It's just bleh to me :(
343guiltymc
June 19th, 2008, 09:05 PM
The future > past

Imho, I've had enough of games trying to replicate ww1/ww2 wars. It's just bleh to me :(
Only if the developers can come up with a good story.
ultama121
June 19th, 2008, 10:04 PM
That's nicer than expected.
Kornman00
June 20th, 2008, 06:39 AM
Only if the developers can come up with a good story.
Developers need to add some real IP to the stories they try to create if they base them off historical or even on going events. Everyone already knows what the fuck happened in WW2, kinda hard to create anything worth while for shooter games with that one :-|
Pooky
June 20th, 2008, 03:20 PM
What's this another brown and grey WWII fps? Pass.
DrunkenSamus
June 20th, 2008, 03:24 PM
The reason why COD4 was great is because it had its own storyline with its own characters. The nuke and the Pripyiat mission was an unexpected twist.
jngrow
June 20th, 2008, 05:12 PM
The graphics only look a little bit better.

But I don't know why, I just don't like COD4/5 graphics that much. It seems like it doesn't have a human touch to it. They just look slightly off, or weird to me, compared to other games.
itszutak
June 20th, 2008, 05:42 PM
What's this another brown and grey WWII fps? Pass.
Change the contrast ratios on your TV. There is color, it's just hidden. :eyesroll:
Warsaw
June 20th, 2008, 09:42 PM
If they had to do a historical war, why couldn't it at least be Vietnam, or Desert Storm...

I think I'll join the passing crew.
Pooky
June 21st, 2008, 03:17 PM
Change the contrast ratios on your TV. There is color, it's just hidden. :eyesroll:

Right, because people should have to mess with their TV settings to see colors other than brown! :awesome:

I like where this genre is going.
kenney001
June 21st, 2008, 03:40 PM
Call of duty 4 had it right. I would rather see an expansion of that story or game than this.......

oh well.....Ill play the demo, but Im not sure about actually purchasing the whole game...
Bodzilla
June 22nd, 2008, 06:40 PM
BLOOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i mean seriously, is that much really fucking necessary >_<.
343guiltymc
July 10th, 2008, 02:37 PM
http://pc.ign.com/articles/887/887836p1.html
TeeKup
July 10th, 2008, 03:26 PM
Treyarch need to fuck off and let IW handle the series. And CoD6 better be a war that hasn't been fucking done yet, like Korea or the Falklands.

I'm curious to see the Balkan peninsula conflicts.
MNC
July 10th, 2008, 05:15 PM
Look at the bright side.

Durr, just lookit them pics. How can you NOT look at the bright side :p
Joshflighter
July 11th, 2008, 01:43 PM
I dont like the look of the game for some reason. D:
Rosco
July 13th, 2008, 10:45 AM
I think treyarch's job is to give us something to play with while IW make a proper one and release it a year later.
il Duce Primo
July 13th, 2008, 02:22 PM
I think treyarch's job is to give us something to play with while IW make a proper one and release it a year later.
I agree and for marketing reasons because most likely everyone will buy it because of COD4 did so well.
NullZero
July 13th, 2008, 03:33 PM
I'll be be waiting for COD6 :). Hopefully, another game set in the future.
Bastinka
July 13th, 2008, 04:16 PM
BLOOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HEADSHOT!!!
Can't wait for it :D
Rosco
July 15th, 2008, 05:01 PM
I'll be be waiting for COD6 :). Hopefully, another game set in the future.


I'll be waiting for them to stop calling it call of duty, but rather start a series on modern warfare. If activision want to fuck up call of duty, let treyarch do it. Mediocre games are fine, aslong as we have something great a year later. :p