PDA

View Full Version : Intel to shut four plants, lay off 6,000



Cojafoji
January 23rd, 2009, 03:02 PM
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9126538

LAWLZ

January 21, 2009 (Computerworld) Amidst a bevy of bad news in the PC market, Intel Corp. (http://www.computerworld.com/action/inform.do?command=search&searchTerms=Intel+Corporation) took two corrective steps this week, aggressively slashing prices on chips on Monday and announcing today that it will close four chip plants and cut as many as 6,000 jobs.

Analysts laid the blame for Intel's actions on weak PC sales combined with tightfisted consumers choosing low-cost models such as netbooks. They also said impressive new CPUs from rival Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (http://www.computerworld.com/action/inform.do?command=search&searchTerms=Advanced+Micro+Devices+Inc.) were a factor.

Monday's CPU price cuts by Intel (http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9126347) -- as much as 40% on some high-end desktop chips -- were aimed at "stimulating demand to consume [chip] inventory," said Ian Lao, an analyst at In-Stat (http://www.computerworld.com/action/inform.do?command=search&searchTerms=In-Stat). "Fabs are already scaling back, but there is always a buffer effect from when a change is started until we see that change on the street. They are trying to match the fab capacity to help limit job cuts if possible."

The price cuts were just the beginning. On Wednesday, Intel said it will close two assembly and test facilities -- one in Penang, Malaysia, and another in Cavite, Philippines. It said it would also stop production at two wafer production plants: Fab 20, an older 200mm plant in Hillsboro, Ore.; and D2, a facility in Santa Clara, Calif.

The changes will affect between 5,000 and 6,000 employees worldwide, Intel said. Not all those employees will lose their jobs, however, as Intel plans to offer some of them positions at other facilities, the company said.
Intel will gradually close the facilities between now and the end of 2009, it said. The closures are designed to "align [Intel's] manufacturing capacity to current market conditions," the company said.

Like many technology companies, Intel has been hit hard by the U.S. recession, which also has affected the global economy. For its fourth quarter, which ended Dec. 27, 2008, Intel's profit plunged 90% (http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9126178) from a year earlier, falling short of Wall Street estimates.

Intel's layoffs and plant closures follow even larger restructuring at AMD. The chip maker said in the fall it would spin off its chip-making facilities and focus on chip design. On Monday, AMD announced it would cut 1,100 jobs (http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9126319), or 9% of its workforce.

Both layoff announcements follow data last week that showed big trouble in the PC market. Worldwide shipments of PCs in the key fourth quarter fell 0.4% year over year, according to IDC. PC shipments in the U.S. actually fell 3.5% year over year in the fourth quarter.

Cautious consumers dragged revenue figures down even more. Fourth-quarter revenue fell up to 20% year over year (http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9125979), the worst drop-off since mid-2001, said Gartner Inc.

Lao said the PC market downturn, while anticipated, was bigger than expected. "Even in the summer, sales were still OK. Then the floor started to drop out from under everything," he said.

The newly lean AMD is also posing a challenge to Intel for the first time in awhile, said Lao, with PC makers showing interest in AMD's low-priced notebook CPUs as well as its new high-end Phenom II CPUs. (http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9125346) Even with a 40% price cut to its Core 2 Quad Q9650 processor, Intel's chips remain pricier than the Phenom II rivals.

Intel is responding. "I do not see this as a big 'kill AMD' move, although there is definitely a component in it," Lao said. "Any time they can take a shot as a bonus, why not?"

As much as it might like, Intel won't cut chip prices further in order to stimulate the PC market, said Stephen Baker (http://www.computerworld.com/action/inform.do?command=search&searchTerms=Stephen+Baker), an analyst at NPD Group Inc. (http://www.computerworld.com/action/inform.do?command=search&searchTerms=The+NPD+Group+Inc.) "It's hard to see [Intel] being any more aggressive on pricing, as it brings the specter of the government around," Baker said.

Intel has been repeatedly investigated for alleged anticompetitive and monopolistic practices. It is currently appealing a long-running European Union antitrust investigation. (http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9122301)

Also, PC makers "don't need any more product," said Baker, who likens the weak demand for PCs to the real estate market, which is very slow despite the abundance of cheap foreclosed homes. "[PC makers] don't want to hold [chip] inventory; nobody wants to hold inventory," he said.
While consumers showed their preference for lower-priced PC models during Christmas, Baker doesn't expect PC makers to respond by breaking any new ground.

"How much lower can you get than $299 for a desktop PC?" Baker said. "If you did, I'm not sure you could stoke a lot of incremental demand." Lao agrees that consumers are unlikely to see cheaper PCs. Intel's most-recent price cuts will be eaten up by PC makers, wholesalers and retailers,which are all suffering from weak sales volume, he said.

Rook
January 23rd, 2009, 03:13 PM
This kind of stuff sucks for everyone, plastics factory here in my town laid off people not long ago... dad was lucky to keep his job.

Jean-Luc
January 23rd, 2009, 03:21 PM
Intel and AMD falling, MS showing an 11% loss in profits. We're in for some deeeep shit.

JunkfoodMan
January 23rd, 2009, 03:27 PM
The workers are. We, the consumers, on the other hand are pretty OK.

Jean-Luc
January 23rd, 2009, 03:33 PM
The workers are. We, the consumers, on the other hand are pretty OK.
We fall as a whole. If our companies fail, the economy goes with it. We need more jobs, not less.

343guiltymc
January 23rd, 2009, 04:13 PM
First Microsoft fired Ensemble, now Ace game studios shuts down. This is bullshit.

Anton
January 23rd, 2009, 07:09 PM
Microsoft didn't "fire" Ensemble studios. They disbanded them, they are still working on projects throughout MS Game Studios. I think.. Correct me if I'm wrong.



This sucks for Intel. I think we'll bounce back after awhile but for now we have to just deal with what we get handed.

Needles
January 24th, 2009, 07:35 PM
Really sucks for the 6,000 people, I thought intel was doing fine.

I was hoping intel would stop making graphics so my cheap dad would be forced to get a nvidia for all our PC's.

Cojafoji
January 26th, 2009, 02:15 PM
Really sucks for the 6,000 people, I thought intel was doing fine.

I was hoping intel would stop making graphics so my cheap dad would be forced to get a nvidia for all our PC's.
you can't even compare nvidia grafx chips to intel grafx chips. it's like a five year old whiskey against a 100 year old cognac from france.