Tactical intervention

[343guiltymc]

http://pc.ign.com/articles/102/1028810p1.html
Can't see how he can charge money for this game,the graphics and gameplay mechanics look ancient. Besides, I'm still waiting for Firearms source.

[Donut]

it is possible that a person expects compensation when he produces a game that he has been working on for years.

[n00b1n8R]

He's aiming this at the sort of players who play counterstrike.
People who play CS arn't in it for the shiny graphics, they're in it for the *snigger* gameplay *chortle*

[RedBaron]

Is that the CSS engine or the 1.6 engine? For some reason it doesn't look as good as CSS, but not as bad as 1.6. I actually know a couple people who might be interested, who have horrible, horrible PC's that can't support much of anything these days.

[n00b1n8R]

It's running on source (they said it's the same engine as CSS so I assume it's not even source07).

[Inferno]

Protip: If it plays well graphics don't matter.

[Ki11a_FTW]

Oh come on, it needs at least orangebox engine

the game looks okay

[legionaire45]

Counter Strike Source with different weapons and a couple of AI gimmicks thrown in.

Meh.

[FreedomFighter7]

It looks friggin great, compared to what I've been playing. I don't know what you're all talking about.

[rossmum]

The guns look better, but WOW, they're even more fucked up mechanics-wise than before. Most of them still look like they're mirrored wrong, but the MP5 isn't - except the cocking handle is on the wrong side altogether.

In any case, fuck CS and anything like it