CISPA

[ThePlague]

http://youtu.be/v8no3E0Hx7k
Supporters

http://youtu.be/45FoVOs42fU
Bill
(http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.3523:)Track Bill (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr3523)
Creator

(http://pastebin.com/xpUu1rqn)These bastards tried to sweep this shit under the table. I haven't heard shit throughout the internet about this until now. Everyone grab your torches and pitchforks, they're at it again.

[Tnnaas]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble; and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

THEY BROKE THE RULES!

[Rainbow Dash]

please pass please pass please pass so we can riot already and make a better world.

[Amit]

BLOOD AND FIRE!!!

[TVTyrant]

JESUS GOD NOOOOOOOO

[Pyong Kawaguchi]

2012 is the end!

[Amit]

MY GOD! 2012 isn't a real Apocalypse. It's a cyberpocalypse!

[Spartan094]

US House PASSES CISPA, onto the Senate
http://www.theverge.com/2012/4/26/2978395/us-house-passes-cispa

E:


The US House of Representatives has just passed the controversial Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, or CISPA (HR 3523) by a vote of 248 to 168. The bill passed mostly along party lines, backed by House Republicans. While the bill is intended to safeguard the US against "cyber threats," critics say that it is too vague and broad, and would give government and military intelligence agencies the ability to inspect private data without the use of warrants. While the bill hasn't garnered the same level of outrage as SOPA did in recent months from companies like Google or Facebook (Facebook supports CISPA), web advocates have been vocal in their opposition to the bill.

The Obama administration has already strongly opposed CISPA and threatened to veto it, so it's not likely that this particular version of the bill will pass. The White House says that the bill lacks civilian oversight and privacy protections, and that "without clear legal protections and independent oversight, information sharing legislation will undermine the public's trust in the government as well as in the internet by undermining fundamental privacy, confidentiality, civil liberties, and consumer protections." Still, the White House has signaled that it is interested in some form of cyber security bill, so this won't likely be its final act.

-Obama admin "opposed" NDAA not to long ago
-Obama signs NDAA
-Obama admin "opposes" CISPA
-Obama ????

I wonder.

[DarkHalo003]

"You offer flip-flops. I offer tax breaks."

[EX12693]

Well.... fuck.

[DarkHalo003]

I'm positive a law suit will end this if it's taken to the Supreme Court. You cannot conduct a search without a warrant. Though they probably gain intelligence without them, a form of a legal bill like this is open game for the Court to say it is unconstitutional.

[=sw=warlord]

I'm positive a law suit will end this if it's taken to the Supreme Court. You cannot conduct a search without a warrant.
Tell that to the TSA.

[rossmum]

Tell that to the TSA.
amen. fuck the tsa forever

fucking shitheads broke some of my stuff when they decided to (i presume from the amount of destruction) upend the contents of my suitcase onto hard flooring. the tsa most likely creates more goddamn threat of terrorism than it stops, incompetent funding-leeching fucktards

[DarkHalo003]

Tell that to the TSA.
Touche.