PDA

View Full Version : Rainbow Six: Vegas PC


Ki11a_FTW
July 28th, 2007, 06:20 PM
Well yesterday i decided to buy Rainbow six vegas for my laptop

It installed fine but on load up it just starts loading, then stops until i press CTRL ALT DELTE


Here are the requirements

OS: Windows XP

Processor: 3 Ghz Pentium 4, Or AMD Athlon , 3.0 Ghz

Systerm RAM: 1GB

Video Card 128 Direct x 9.0 c-compliant,
Shader 3.0 enabled video card (256 MB reccomended)

Sound Card: meh i dont think that maters

HD spaace: 7 GB


---------------------------
My laptop specs:

OS: Windows Vista Home Premium 32 bit

Processor: AMD Turion(tm) 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-50 (Two 1.6 Ghz Processors)

System RAM: 1024 MB of RAM (1 GIG)

Video Card:

ATI X1400

Video RAM: 132 MB

Video Card 3D Acceleration: yes

Video HW Transform & Lighting: yes

Vertex Shader Ver 2.0

Pixel Shader Ver 2.0


Hard rive Space: 143 GB Remaining





I thought i could squeeze by with that.. it also apears other people did to, when i was Researching on :google:
Dr Nick
July 28th, 2007, 07:56 PM
learn about sharing ram. My friend was lucky enough to get a PC with it already set up.
You might also want to buy another gig of ram or so. I got 2 GB ram and 256 MB vram, and I still lag in high detail areas/
Ki11a_FTW
July 28th, 2007, 09:11 PM
Dr. Nick, can you tell me ur PC specs for a comparison

thx for the help
Atty
July 28th, 2007, 09:24 PM
Rainbow 6 Vegas is a poorly ported POS. Good luck with it.
Ki11a_FTW
July 28th, 2007, 09:53 PM
Do you think its because i installed it on my external hard disk?
Xetsuei
July 28th, 2007, 10:33 PM
Your processory is only 1.6 ghz, no it is not 3.2 ghz. You can not add both of the core speeds together, it doesn't work like that.
Ki11a_FTW
July 28th, 2007, 11:22 PM
I know, it has performance of 3.2, atleast thats what systemrequiremtslab says
Atty
July 28th, 2007, 11:46 PM
No, it doesn't. If it's 1.6GHz Dual Core then it's performing about 40% better then a 1.6GHz Single Core, and thats not equal to 3.2GHz Single Core. Although it's hard to make that decision since you'd have to have them the same architecture, and all these other stupid variables.

In short, no, it's not.
Xetsuei
July 29th, 2007, 12:21 AM
I know, it has performance of 3.2, atleast thats what systemrequiremtslab says

The system requirements lab is a dumbass.
Ki11a_FTW
July 29th, 2007, 12:23 AM
It said i couldent run Halo 2, but i can >_< stupid thing, time to sew

( i lack spelling skills)
et_cg
July 29th, 2007, 12:39 AM
Rainbow 6 Vegas is a poorly ported POS. Good luck with it.

Very true.


Do you think its because i installed it on my external hard disk?

Using any application on a external storage device deludes performance. (USB or Firewire). You might want to try the internal HDD.


Xetsuei™;111575']The system requirements lab is a dumbass.

The people in the system requirements lab is a are dumbasses.


It The game requirements said I couldent couldn't run Halo 2, but I can. >_< Stupid thing game, time to sew sue.

There you go.
Ki11a_FTW
July 29th, 2007, 11:06 AM
Thanks for fixing my message. I will copy it to by IHD
Dr Nick
July 29th, 2007, 11:25 AM
http://www.xfire.com/profile/hangintotheleft/

PC specs are there.
X3RO SHIF7
July 29th, 2007, 11:41 AM
um, ur GPU blows, not to mention the processor is questionable, a mobile x1400 will not run any new game well, if it runs them at all.
Dr Nick
July 29th, 2007, 11:45 AM
Actually it does. But you're right, not very well. I'm planning to get a new one.
Ki11a_FTW
July 29th, 2007, 11:57 AM
um, ur GPU blows, not to mention the processor is questionable, a mobile x1400 will not run any new game well, if it runs them at all.


runs halo 2 on medium