PDA

View Full Version : Should I buy it?



Haloking365
September 13th, 2007, 05:03 PM
Well, I was at a gun store today, just browsing around, and I discovered this (http://www.nrapublications.org/tar/CenturyGPWASR10.asp) on the shelf. Being the 17 year old game freak I am, I needed to hold it. Thats when i discovered there was a small price tag hanging off it. Expecting some rediculous price up in the thousands, I nearly dropped the damn thing when i saw it was only $374.95!

Not only do I have enough cash for that, but I also have a license for it as well. The only thinh stopping me is why would I buy it? Its not like I can take it outback and "play" with it. Although there is a shooting range not far from my house. I honestly dont know. I want it, but the practical uses are quite limited.

What do you guys think? :confused:

Digikid
September 13th, 2007, 05:24 PM
I think that you are insane.....but it will be great for scaring off burglars. :D

Zeph
September 13th, 2007, 05:37 PM
It's cheaper than a .22 to shoot.

Haloking365
September 13th, 2007, 05:38 PM
I know that im insane..... I thought we already had that established? but anyway, I think im gonna get it...

Digikid
September 13th, 2007, 05:41 PM
Ask yourself this: WHY?

WHY would you want one of these things?
WHY would you pay that much for it?
What would be its purpose?
Would it be used against you in any way shape or form?

Shard
September 13th, 2007, 07:35 PM
^ To Kill someone.

Mr Buckshot
September 13th, 2007, 09:52 PM
If you really like ARs, then go for it. Personally I'd prefer handguns if I actually owned real firearms, but up in Canada guns are forbidden unless you are a hunter (and yet we have shootings going on thanks to you Americans and your gun laws below, though fortunately the shootings are always targeted at other criminals).

It is a nice gun though, especially the bayonet. See if you can fix a scope as well.

Flyboy
September 13th, 2007, 10:05 PM
For home defense you want a smaller weapon. An AK has a 7.62 round which offers quite a lot of stopping power, but if you need to carry it around corners, your not going to be able to react to a thread quickly.

Now if you don't care about size, and just want a big fucking bullet, may I suggest an old fashion BAR. Lets say that your in a gun fight, and you opponent is hiding behind a fridge, with the BAR you don't need to wait for him to peek his head out, rather, just shoot through the fridge.

But seeing as you just want it just because it's cool, then get it. Great deal.

Cortexian
September 13th, 2007, 10:33 PM
All you could use it for legally is target shooting at ranges, or home defense. Now ask yourself if your going to pay for a range fee, or if it's just going to sit in your house until a burglar shows up.

SnaFuBAR
September 13th, 2007, 10:36 PM
I'm a marksman myself, and i see total crap accuracy on this thing. Either that, or the shooter was really crap, but i'm sure it's the gun's fault. The ak's and their clones are manufactured with loose tollerances, so they're not much use for target plinking or similar.

I'd much prefer a bushmaster rifle over this for target shooting, especially since this clone costs about 1.75x more than an authentic AK. Big waste of cash.

ExAm
September 13th, 2007, 11:36 PM
Ask yourself this: WHY?

WHY would you want one of these things?
WHY would you pay that much for it?
What would be its purpose?
Would it be used against you in any way shape or form?It's a collector's item, and shooting is a hobby, you hippie douchebag!

Texrat
September 14th, 2007, 10:15 AM
the practical uses are quite limited

Key reason *I* wouldn't get it.

Makes more sense to buy a decent rifle, pistol or shotgun IMO. This thing couldn't be used in practical applications, and would just be sitting there waiting to be stolen and misused.

rossmum
September 14th, 2007, 10:28 AM
No. You could pick up a genuine Avtomat Kalashnikova cheaper, as Snaf said, or you could pick up a bolt-action (much better for target shooting, hunting, etc, though not so much for home defence) instead.

Patrickssj6
September 14th, 2007, 10:35 AM
Well, I was at a gun store today,
I just read the few first words in this topic and I already voted "Hell No". Then I read the rest of his post.

Some boomboom and Decoration is not worth 350$ to me. Sorry. :D

Haloking365
September 14th, 2007, 11:31 AM
Well, i thank you all for your opinions, and im leaning towards getting it. I'd like to pick up shooting as a sport, and the fact that they have an AK for so cheap is almost too good to pass up. But you guys said you could get a genuine AK for cheaper. Can someone steer me in the right direction? Also, someone said that that gun's 1.75x the price of a genuine AK. So AK's are only $200? Something dosent sound right with that.

Texrat
September 14th, 2007, 11:57 AM
I'd like to pick up shooting as a sport

I wouldn't call shooting that thing a sport.

There are a handful of doctors and lawyers who might disagree with me though. But they got busted in Texas for shooting livestock from an aircraft using semiautomatic and automatic weapons. Many years ago.

NullZero
September 14th, 2007, 12:29 PM
I wouldn't call shooting that thing a sport.

There are a handful of doctors and lawyers who might disagree with me though. But they got busted in Texas for shooting livestock from an aircraft using semiautomatic and automatic weapons. Many years ago.

I think he meant on the shooting range?

hobojoe
September 14th, 2007, 12:36 PM
If you have no shooting expreiance before. Or if all you want to do is target shooting. This is not the rifle you want. I suggest a smaller calaiber such as a .22 long shot. less kick but much cheaper ammo. Kimber, Mosberg and a few other companys. Make very nice ones And are worth it. They last a very long time.

But thats my input. If you like the look of an AK and the kick. Then have fun buddy.

Texrat
September 14th, 2007, 01:02 PM
I think he meant on the shooting range?

Well, yeah, duh, but I still can't see sport in that. As another poster said, not much in the way of precision/accuracy. You'd wind up just chewing up the targets. Yeah, I'm sure that's fun for a while.

Gimme a 30.06 or .357 and move the target back (WAY back for the rifle). I'll show you a pretty pattern. ;)

Haloking365
September 14th, 2007, 04:26 PM
Ok, after reading what seems like endless reviews, I'm leaning towards getting it. The negative things I've heard are:

1. Trigger Slap: Newer models claim not to have this, but if it occurs, you could either mill away a small part of the piece, or just buy an after market piece for like $14.99.
2. Cantered(turned) front Sight: Easily fixable with the removal of a pin, and manually turning the sight.
3. Tight-fitted Mag's: A byproduct of Century Arms' milling to accept double-stack mags, easily fixable with some minor filing.
4. Wood is unfinished, so you can apply your own finish.

Positive are as follows:
1. Excellent reliability.
2. Almost impossible to jam.
3. Wood is unfinished, so you can apply your own finish.
4. TON of after market parts and upgrades.

Offspring
September 14th, 2007, 08:32 PM
I'm all for vintage guns. i say "fuck it" and buy it.

rossmum
September 15th, 2007, 12:51 AM
Just get a real AK. This thing is another one of the millions of reproductions with minor 'improvements' (I use the term very loosely here) and a bigger price tag. If you get the real thing, you probably won't have to worry about any of that crap - you can take it out and take it to war straight from the vendor. That's why the AK is such a popular weapon - it's so damn simple and reliable.

Haloking365
September 15th, 2007, 12:57 AM
And where would i go about getting a real AK? I just dont see anywhere that sells them. Links?

rossmum
September 15th, 2007, 12:57 AM
I don't live in the US and they're illegal here, so I wouldn't have a clue. Ask Warsaw or Snaf or something.

Haloking365
September 15th, 2007, 01:03 AM
Ok, warsaw says that the real deal is illegal over here (US) because of the yeltson-clinton treaty, and that the lookalikes are hard as hell to find. He sayd im best off getting this. So im going with it.

Zeph
September 15th, 2007, 02:00 AM
I suggest a smaller calaiber such as a .22 long shot. less kick but much cheaper ammo.

No, precious metal prices in America are going up ridiculously high. Domestic ammunition prices are soaring. The 7.62x39s can be imported and only cost a fraction of what you'd have to pay for a .22 round here. My campus' adv marksmanship class picked up 60k .22 rounds for about 4 cents a shot. Our supplier has told us the current prices are going to cause the price to go up when they get more in. They'll be at least six cents a shot now. My uncle gets his AK-47's ammo imported for about 1.5 cents a shot. While it might go up within a month, it's still cheaper.

My cousin hunts with a 30-30. It's enough to decapitate a buck (think hollow point hitting the vertebrae and how heavy the head is) and I love it. It went from being about 75 cents a shot to 2 bucks a shot over the past year.

Zeph
September 15th, 2007, 02:04 AM
Ok, warsaw says that the real deal is illegal over here (US) because of the yeltson-clinton treaty, and that the lookalikes are hard as hell to find. He sayd im best off getting this. So im going with it.

wait, what? The yelstin-clinton treaty covers quite a lot and I very well might be missing a small detail, but how does it make an AK illegal? I thought it mainly dealt with the demilitarization of nuclear and conventional missile weapons and such. I mean, my uncle has one and a US marshal buddy of his has even shot it.

Cortexian
September 15th, 2007, 02:23 AM
My cousin hunts with a 30-30. It's enough to decapitate a buck (think hollow point hitting the vertebrae and how heavy the head is) and I love it. It went from being about 75 cents a shot to 2 bucks a shot over the past year.
...








You hunt with hollow points? May I ask why? Oh wait, your American aren't you? :mysterysolved:. I use a 30-30 lever action (think wild west style) iron sight for hunting whitetails and Mule Deer when the forest is to thick to use one of our scoped rifles. When we have clear shots, we usually use a .270 or a .308 (.308 is the highest non-restricted caliber here I believe). Both use a Leupold VX-III 6.5-20x50mm Long Range scope (http://www.leupold.com/hunting-and-shooting/products/scopes/vx-iii-riflescopes/vx-iii-6-5-20x50mm-long-range-target/).

SnaFuBAR
September 15th, 2007, 02:34 AM
Well, i thank you all for your opinions, and im leaning towards getting it.
then you didn't take the opinions seriously and had your mind made up before you even posted the topic...:eyesroll:
I'd like to pick up shooting as a sport, so why are you looking at an AK clone? and the fact that they have an AK for so cheap no is almost too good to pass up. pass up this crap-pile. But you guys said you could get a genuine AK for cheaper. Can someone steer me in the right direction? they're so plentiful it's not even funny. Also, someone said that that gun's 1.75x the price of a genuine AK. So AK's are only $200? Something dosent sound right with that.no, the only thing that doesn't sound right is paying 2x as much for a FAKE AK. would you pay that much more for a kit car than the real thing?
truth in bold. the fact that you want to take up shooting as a sport with such an inaccurate weapon speaks volumes about your actual gun knowledge/familiarity/experience. Also, AK's aren't illegal in the entire US, only a few states. if you can buy a rifle at 17 with a high cap mag like that, i DOUBT an AK is illegal in that state.

Agamemnon
September 15th, 2007, 02:48 AM
truth in bold. the fact that you want to take up shooting as a sport with such an inaccurate weapon speaks volumes about your actual gun knowledge/familiarity/experience. Also, AK's aren't illegal in the entire US, only a few states. if you can buy a rifle at 17 with a high cap mag like that, i DOUBT an AK is illegal in that state.
So what you're saying is is that he might be just trying to save face by buying a firearm and saying he's going to take up shooting as a "sport" when he might be buying it because he thinks it's cool and then asked us on the Internet to look cool? :awesome:

SnaFuBAR
September 15th, 2007, 03:00 AM
possibly http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/4808/dodgysi5.gif

ExAm
September 15th, 2007, 05:19 AM
Also, it's no fake "AK clone". It's the real deal.


Once manufacturing difficulties had been overcome, a redesigned version designated the AKM (M for modernized or upgraded—in Russian: Автомат Калашникова Модернизированный) was introduced in 1959.[12] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-47#_note-10) This new model used a stamped sheet metal receiver and featured a slanted muzzle brake (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muzzle_brake) on the end of the barrel (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_barrel) to compensate for muzzle (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muzzle_%28firearm%29) rise under recoil. In addition, a hammer retarder was added to prevent the weapon from firing out of battery (without the bolt being fully closed), during rapid or automatic fire.

Not a piece of shit, either.

EDIT: Misrenemberinated. Disregard.

SnaFuBAR
September 15th, 2007, 05:42 AM
Also, it's no fake "AK clone". It's the real deal.

OH? Apparently, you can't read.

"The Century Int’l Arms, Inc., GP WASR-10 is a semi-automatic-only rendition of the famous 7.62x39 mm AKM rifle configured with a fixed laminated stock and a laminated fore-end."

fake fake fake fake fake. If it's not Kalashnikov, it's a CLONE. You've not either shown it to be a good rifle for sport shooting, either, and you know it isn't.

ExAm
September 15th, 2007, 05:58 AM
OH? Apparently, you can't read.

"The Century Int’l Arms, Inc., GP WASR-10 is a semi-automatic-only rendition of the famous 7.62x39 mm AKM rifle configured with a fixed laminated stock and a laminated fore-end."

fake fake fake fake fake. If it's not Kalashnikov, it's a CLONE. You've not either shown it to be a good rifle for sport shooting, either, and you know it isn't.*Commits seppuku in shame*

Haloking365
September 15th, 2007, 02:08 PM
Ok, to be completely honest, I don't give a fuck what you guys think. Im not posting to "look cool". I asked here because there are some people who can give positive feedback from experience. I wanted to know, from experience, what this gun is like. I've been reading reviews and specs for the last few days. It looks like a solid-handling gun.

I came here to ask for respectable opinions. Not fucking n00bs who say "OmG!!111!1 its Laiek a Reel Ak!1!@!2 Buy its look cool!!2!1!!11". So if your one: Get. The. Fuck. Out. Good day.

Also, im pretty sure all imported Russian weapons were banned in the Yelstin-Clinton treaty, correct me if im wrong.

SnaFuBAR
September 15th, 2007, 02:16 PM
*Commits seppuku in shame*

[/hug] oh man that was freaking hillarious. :lmao: we're still cool, buddeh. /hf

SnaFuBAR
September 15th, 2007, 02:17 PM
Also, im pretty sure all imported Russian weapons were banned in the Yelstin-Clinton treaty, correct me if im wrong.
wrong.

Haloking365
September 15th, 2007, 07:48 PM
Ok, thank you.

rossmum
September 15th, 2007, 08:18 PM
Just get a Mosin-Nagant 91/30. Fuck, you could buy three for the same price in some places, you could not only hit the side of a barn but also hit it from over a hundred metres away (even out to a kilometre or more, which is much more than I can say for the AK), and it has a lot more power behind it. I'd rather have a 91/30 because as much as I love the AK (genuine ones, mind you), it's just more suitable for almost every application. It can be used to shoot targets competitively, hunt, plink stuff... the AK is good for mowing people down at close range. It's an assault rifle, that's the only purpose it was or ever will be intended for.

SnaFuBAR
September 16th, 2007, 02:52 AM
haha, hey ross, they're gonna be on sale again here for 75 bucks each.

rossmum
September 16th, 2007, 06:09 AM
Fuck you, find a way to legally send me one. :|

ExAm
September 16th, 2007, 02:28 PM
If you're an american citizen, you can join the NRA and get a free Springfield :D

rossmum
September 17th, 2007, 02:42 AM
Are you serious?

You BASTARDS.

Bodzilla
September 17th, 2007, 03:15 AM
lmfao ross xD

ExAm
September 17th, 2007, 09:57 PM
Are you serious?

You BASTARDS.:awesome:

DrunkenSamus
September 17th, 2007, 10:34 PM
One of the few good things about living in the U.S.

Agamemnon
September 17th, 2007, 11:50 PM
Yeah, they give you free guns to kill people with. Great stuff. :downs:

Neuro Guro
September 18th, 2007, 12:32 AM
-

ExAm
September 18th, 2007, 02:40 AM
Yeah, they give you free guns to kill people hunt and compete with. Great stuff. :downs:Do you have to see the terrible side of everything?

Patrickssj6
September 18th, 2007, 02:17 PM
Do you have to see the terrible side of everything?
The negative side of it overweights the positive one.Sadly but it's true.

Sure smoking brings people together...if they suffer from lung cancer after that and endanger all the people around them is another thing.

SnaFuBAR
September 18th, 2007, 02:25 PM
o hey forget the notion that armed civilians save 2 million lives/year in the US. o ok. no, shut up.

Patrickssj6
September 18th, 2007, 03:12 PM
In the US? Cool.

I wonder what happens in the rest of the world every year.

SnaFuBAR
September 18th, 2007, 03:16 PM
last i remember, we were talking about the NRA handing out guns. what the hell does the rest of the world have to do with it? point null, pat.

Haloking365
September 18th, 2007, 03:30 PM
o hey forget the notion that armed civilians save 2 million lives/year in the US. o ok. no, shut up.
Lol, i can see the headlines now: "Bank robbery thwarted by Klashnikov weilding civilian". :XD:

Patrickssj6
September 18th, 2007, 03:35 PM
I don't know which discussion you joined then. I'm talking about negative effects of guns and how they overweight the positive ones and not whether NRA handing out guns has a positive effect for the society in the US;only for your reference.

I guess this is a 1-man-discussion then. Discussion closed.

Texrat
September 18th, 2007, 03:35 PM
I know you didn't mean to, Haloking, but you just made the case for opponents of assault rifles. ;)

Haloking365
September 18th, 2007, 03:44 PM
I know you didn't mean to, Haloking, but you just made the case for opponents of assault rifles. ;)
I obviously wouldnt carry this in my car or anything. I may seem like a goofball here, but believe me, im not stupid. And i believe fully in the 2nd amendment (for those of you who dont know, thats the right to bear arms).

Agamemnon
September 18th, 2007, 05:22 PM
Do you have to see the terrible side of everything?
Yes. And I do the same for the things everyone commonly sees as the negative and finding the positive in it. It's called investigation. Instead of blatantly hearing about it on the news and having it "confirmed" to me, I'm still going to be skeptical about it and conduct my own personal research.