PDA

View Full Version : Anti-Porn Groups Demand Ban on Skin Mags



Kornman00
November 8th, 2007, 02:13 AM
Source (http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,155649,00.html?ESRC=army-a.nl).


Dozens of anti-pornography groups asked the U.S. Congress to force the Pentagon to keep sexually related material from being sold in military stores. Pornographic material was banned from being sold in military establishments nearly 10 years ago, but Christian group American Family Association claimed that adult fare, including Penthouse and Playboy material, is still being sold in the stores, USA Today reported Monday.
Poll: Should skin mags be available at U.S. Military installations? (http://www.military.com/) The Pentagon deemed those materials aren't explicit enough to pull from its stores.
"They're saying 'we're not selling stuff that's sexually explicit' -- and we say it's pornography," Donald Wildmon, head of the American Family Association, told USA Today.
A letter-writing campaign launched Friday aimed to convince Congress to "get the Pentagon to obey the law," he added.
The Military Honor and Decency Act of 1996 is supposed to bar "sexually explicit material" from being sold in stores on military bases, the newspaper said. It defines porn as "the dominant theme of which depicts or describes nudity" or sexual activities "in a lascivious way."
Not in my Army kthx.

Bodzilla
November 8th, 2007, 02:21 AM
they can go and suck my (REMOVED BY OVER-ZEALOUS CHRISTIANS GROUP)

rossmum
November 8th, 2007, 02:24 AM
Why the fuck did they ban it in the first place?

Oh, right, it's the exploitation of women and not politically correct and so on :rolleyes:

Kornman00
November 8th, 2007, 02:27 AM
they can go and suck my (REMOVED BY OVER-ZEALOUS CHRISTIANS GROUP)
=o

zilla got castrated by an over-zealous christians group!

DaneO'Roo
November 8th, 2007, 02:28 AM
Uh....

The christians don't want to make people gay now do they?

Reaper Man
November 8th, 2007, 03:13 AM
they can go and suck my (REMOVED BY OVER-ZEALOUS CHRISTIANS GROUP)
Circumcision accident, amirite?

Ah well, you don't deserve to be in the gene pool anyway. :downs:

n00b1n8R
November 8th, 2007, 04:15 AM
:ohsnap:

also overzealous much.

Phobias
November 8th, 2007, 06:00 AM
Uh....

The christians don't want to make people gay now do they?


I don't see why not... Could always use more fish in the sea.

Bodzilla
November 8th, 2007, 06:11 AM
Circumcision accident, amirite?

Ah well, you don't deserve to be in the gene pool anyway. :downs:
:o
/wrists

i cant believe these ppl do be honest.
to take away a mans pr0n is just.... evil.

Pure evil.

nooBBooze
November 8th, 2007, 07:57 AM
Also, if you take a mans porn, hes bound to become either gay, pedophile, or a hypocrit fundamentalist whos trying to impose his wacky morals on other ppl.
oh wait...so thats what their really up to :tinfoil:

and even if im wrong, i wanna keep my porn :(

Skiiran
November 8th, 2007, 10:13 AM
Also, if you take a mans porn, hes bound to become either gay, pedophile, or a hypocrit fundamentalist whos trying to impose his wacky morals on other ppl.
oh wait...so thats what their really up to :tinfoil:

and even if im wrong, i wanna keep my porn :(
It is still only a one-in-three chance of him going fucknutter.

Kornman00
November 8th, 2007, 12:06 PM
This, my friends, is why the
eWEjvCRPrCo

Pooky
November 8th, 2007, 04:17 PM
Also, if you take a mans porn, hes bound to become either gay, pedophile, or a hypocrit fundamentalist whos trying to impose his wacky morals on other ppl.
oh wait...so thats what their really up to :tinfoil:

and even if im wrong, i wanna keep my porn :(

Yeah, cause that's why people are gay. I love the irony in how you then proceed to talk about morals.



I don't see what's wrong with a bunch of army dudes fapping, fuck Christian activists.

Dole
November 8th, 2007, 04:50 PM
Also, if you take a mans porn, hes bound to become either gay, pedophile, or a hypocrit fundamentalist whos trying to impose his wacky morals on other ppl.
Porn = virility?

I find that hilarious considering porn has had a completely negligible existence up until sixty years ago, and coincidentally the successive generations of developed countries since a not long after that time period (id est societies where these generations indisputably have the ability to access pornography at a whim) are reputed for becoming progressively more reliant and immature than ever before.

paladin
November 8th, 2007, 05:12 PM
This, my friends, is why the
eWEjvCRPrCo

EPIC win...

Zeph
November 8th, 2007, 05:18 PM
Uh....

The christians don't want to make people gay now do they?

epic.

Phopojijo
November 8th, 2007, 06:19 PM
Circumcision accident, amirite?

Ah well, you don't deserve to be in the gene pool anyway. :downs:That's Jewish... Christians keep their skin.

Bodzilla
November 8th, 2007, 08:43 PM
theres no wai someones comming after my weener with scissors.
they can :gtfo:

Agamemnon
November 8th, 2007, 09:10 PM
This thread is retarded. Please lock por favor. Too many people thinking they know what they're talking about.

ICEE
November 8th, 2007, 09:58 PM
Also, if you take a mans porn, hes bound to become either gay, pedophile, or a hypocrit fundamentalist whos trying to impose his wacky morals on other ppl.
oh wait...so thats what their really up to :tinfoil:

and even if im wrong, i wanna keep my porn :(


that is to true

Mass
November 8th, 2007, 10:00 PM
Donald Wildmon, head of the American Family Association


Due to recent events, this man's position undeniably indicates either drug abuse or closet homosexuality, and quite possibly both.

Also,

ZOMG SOLDIERS LOOK AT PORN!?

They might be raping some poor Arab chick in the stead of porn anyway. No harm is done.

ZOMG THIS IS GOD'S ARMY AND GOD HATES SPERM WASTAGE.

Waits for person to respond "then he must hate you/so-and-so."

ICEE
November 8th, 2007, 10:05 PM
Waits for person to respond "then he must hate you/so-and-so.



damn. thanks for taking my response mass.


gods army. bs lawlz

n00b1n8R
November 8th, 2007, 10:23 PM
This, my friends, is why the
eWEjvCRPrCo
I see your WoW version and raise you a narutard.

O16lsQwQQqE


Porn = virility?

I find that hilarious considering porn has had a completely negligible existence up until sixty years ago, and coincidentally the successive generations of developed countries since a not long after that time period (id est societies where these generations indisputably have the ability to access pornography at a whim) are reputed for becoming progressively more reliant and immature than ever before.

IAWTP.

still, I don't see why they can't keep their skin mags D:

paladin
November 8th, 2007, 10:52 PM
theres no wai someones comming after my weener with scissors.
they can :gtfo:

QFT, thats why they do it when your a baby... no one when they're older would be in their right mind to let it happen.

ImSpartacus
November 8th, 2007, 10:55 PM
This thread is retarded. Please lock por favor. Too many people thinking they know what they're talking about.

I like to think I know whether I want to keep my man cannon intact. ;)

Anyway, I don't know why soldiers can't have porn anyway. They are all supposed to be straight, right? I say we keep em that way. :hump:

nooBBooze
November 9th, 2007, 09:00 AM
porn= virility?

I find that hilarious considering porn has had a completely negligible existence up until sixty years ago, and coincidentally the successive generations of developed countries since a not long after that time period (id est societies where these generations indisputably have the ability to access pornography at a whim) are reputed for becoming progressively more reliant and immature than ever before.

D:
tM2t_lso83E

nah but youve got some points tough. however, theres always been a certain amount of explicity in traditional painting for example. if you look at the 18/19 century there was basically an entire genre dedicated to just pointlessly show nude chicks. and even if this "salon art" was only available to the rich, (since those paintings were only exhibitet in those salons) and even if it had some cheesy, pseudointellectual pretext (like "aphrodite hunting deers"), it still was rather some kind of forefather for the playboy magazine.

quick summary: even back then(at least in rather "civilized" social classes), ppl liked to fap to pics of nude chicks. they only liked to hide it behind hypocrit double standarts.
:eng101:

but like i said, even if i am wrong, dont take away my porn instructional material. kthxpls?

Kornman00
November 9th, 2007, 09:51 AM
I see your WoW version and raise you a narutard.

I HAD to use the wow version because they fucking removed the actual puppet play from youtube due to something called "copyrights" or whatever :downs:

Pooky
November 9th, 2007, 04:40 PM
This thread is retarded. Please lock por favor. Too many people thinking they know what they're talking about.

What guy doesn't know what they're talking about when it comes to porn :raise:

besides stealth