m107(aka m82)

[kid908]

=P i still need to get animation for it but here's the new sniper rifle. also skin is temp.
http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n211/kid908/m107reload.jpg
http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n211/kid908/m107tp2.jpg
http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n211/kid908/m107tp.jpg
http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n211/kid908/m107.jpg
C&C

[Bad Waffle]

You should make it a habit of posting renders and wireframes.

[kid908]

can't render i use gmax...should i put that in my sig!!! and the method you use for wireframe requires render.

[ICEE]

get a good skin for it and I will animate for you if you like

[Con]

can't render i use gmax...should i put that in my sig!!! and the method you use for wireframe requires render.
just take a screenshot of the viewport.

[Sel]

just take a screenshot of the viewport.

That is gross, you are gross.

But yeah, viewport stuff looks nasty D:

The sniper looks good to me, but then Im sure snaf will walk in and say otherwise.

[kid908]

=P k i took viewpoint wireframes.
here's model's counts:
vertices: 4095
faces: 7860
polies: 4103

wireframes:
http://static1.filefront.com/images/personal/k/kid908/66403/xcfzgqbucr.jpg
http://static1.filefront.com/images/personal/k/kid908/66403/lmluxpghgw.jpg
http://static1.filefront.com/images/personal/k/kid908/66403/natfwhshue.jpg

[PenGuin1362]

Wasted polies up the ass, inaccurate, and just overall ew.

[rossmum]

Wasted polies up the ass, inaccurate, and just overall ew.
this, try using references next time

[SgtBotley]

LOL. as if game models have to be exaclty accurate of real life references...
its going in the Halo 1 engine ffs... if it was going in Uneal 3 or Cryengine 2 i'd understand the need for elite detail *drools about the thought of the unreal engine*, i mean cmon give this guy a brake.. the gun looks delicious if its in the distance and you're not analysing it with a magnifying glass.

slap a secsy skin on that model.

- then optimise a little.

[MMFSdjw]

There are alot of wasted polies on there. But it does look nice so screw accuacy.

There is no need to model the inside of the barrel.
Think about what will be seen from the FP perspective and simplify everything.
Only add detail where it will be useful.

[paintballakid5]

try to delete some of the things on the left side of the gun because you will never see those in FP.;)

and try to lower the poly count by just deleting things that can be added by a Texture and a bumpmap.

:) good luck

that gun should have somewhere between 1,500-2,000 polys ;) NOT 4,000!

[ICEE]

try to delete some of the things on the left right side of the gun because you will never see those in FP.;)

and try to lower the poly count by just deleting things that can be added by a Texture and a bumpmap.

:) good luck

that gun should have somewhere between 1,500-2,000 polys ;) NOT 4,000!


ORLY? What if the animator chooses to make a more elaborate melee attack or posing animation? That could very easily show the other side of the gun.

[PenGuin1362]

try to delete some of the things on the left side of the gun because you will never see those in FP.;)

and try to lower the poly count by just deleting things that can be added by a Texture and a bumpmap.

:) good luck

that gun should have somewhere between 1,500-2,000 polys ;) NOT 4,000!

Well...if you delete the left side, you won't see shit since the left side is what you see in fp...and you can't add bump maps to weapons in halo...so...that won't help you either. And for the last god damn time, polygons don't mean jack to the game engine. The game renders triangles, more triangles, more potential lag. and 4,000 triangles is fine for todays standards.

[paintballakid5]

Well...if you delete the left side, you won't see shit since the left side is what you see in fp...and you can't add bump maps to weapons in halo...so...that won't help you either. And for the last god damn time, polygons don't mean jack to the game engine. The game renders triangles, more triangles, more potential lag. and 4,000 triangles is fine for todays standards.

:eek:oops my bad i meant to say the Right side. lol y bad.. but i didn't mean Delete the WHOLE side i meant just delete little things such as knobs and switchs.;)

[kid908]

:eek:oops my bad i meant to say the Right side. lol y bad.. but i didn't mean Delete the WHOLE side i meant just delete little things such as knobs and switchs.;)

=P im going to need the entire right side when reloading. cuz you pull the ophandle after reloading to chamber the bullet =P i might delect the inside tho.