Printable View
cuda_supported_cards.txt
GeForce GTX 285
GeForce GTX 470
GeForce GTX 570
GeForce GTX 580
Quadro CX
Quadro FX 3700M
Quadro FX 3800
Quadro FX 3800M
Quadro FX 4800
Quadro FX 5800
Quadro 2000
Quadro 2000D
Quadro 2000M
Quadro 3000M
Quadro 4000
Quadro 4000M
Quadro 5000
Quadro 5000M
Quadro 5010M
Quadro 6000
Sorry about your lack of Adobe awesomeness support.
(you can actually just edit this list if your GPU isn't on it and it's newer than the 285)
LOL huge card:
http://static.techspot.com/images2/n...22-image-1.jpg
I use GIMP bro. Adobe can go suck a nut with their bloatware.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cortexian
Whoa whoa I didn't know GIMP did video and effects editing?!!
(Because it doesn't)
I can't wait any longer. My CPU temps hit 65 just by watching a single youtube vid with no other tabs open in Chrome. I trust Hardware Canucks' review, so I'm going to go with the Corsair H60.
But you're talking to me like I need CUDA, and since I don't do video and effects editing, it's a wasted Nvidia/Adobe feelgood effort.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cortexian
My fanboyism > your arguements.
Overclocked results.
They trade blows. Fuck yeah, head-to-head competition is awesome. Also, it's looking highly unlikely that we'll see GK110 before the HD 8970...
Those results look more like immature drivers on the 680's part. That's usually the case when one card beats out another in some tests but then loses by a significant amount in others (like that Metro 2033 test).
HD7970 has immature drivers, too. The GTX 680 performs poorly in Metro 2033 and Crysis anyways, a result of the architecture this time around. At stock clocks, it still lost to the HD7970.