Re: The Studio Quick-Crit Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
il Duce Primo
If you want to help someone the last thing you ever do is put them down. What he said might have been true but you never have to say it in such a disrespecting way. Snaf didn't even follow through with any help. He has not gained any amount of knowledge from Snaf's post.
I'm not sure how you can see that as disrespect. Blunt maybe, but he's doing anything more than answer the simple question 'Forerunner style or not?'. Just because he didn't write up why it's not forerunner doesn't mean he should'nt have posted.
Re: The Studio Quick-Crit Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Evil_Monkey
How is it the truth when he says it looks absolutely nothing like forerunner? It has some resemblance of forerunner.
It's vaguely the same shape?
Re: The Studio Quick-Crit Thread
Its like somewhat like something the Combine would have. That's the first thing I thought of, which, in my opinion (combine architecture), looks like bent out of shape forerunner.
What screamed at me was the fact that it looked like a Combine suspension bridge counterweight (for a very small suspension bridge).
Also, expect bluntness on these forums; they are infamous for them. They help you, and they tear you down. It is unfair sometimes, but so is life.
Re: The Studio Quick-Crit Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Timo
I'm not sure how you can see that as disrespect. Blunt maybe, but he's doing anything more than answer the simple question 'Forerunner style or not?'. Just because he didn't write up why it's not forerunner doesn't mean he should'nt have posted.
He said absolutely not. What he posted was just a simple modification of a forerunner building bungie made. And Ross, you think it vaguely resembles the structure. Open your damn eyes, he did a simple modification; how does it not look like the original?
Re: The Studio Quick-Crit Thread
The huge spikes that turn it from something forerunner into something that's not :? Sure the bottom looks forerunner but the spikes kill the look. Just because it looks like the original doesn't mean it's therefore forerunner.
Re: The Studio Quick-Crit Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Evil_Monkey
I think you are wrong, they are in H1 only I remodelled them to have more detail.
Go and have a look.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Evil_Monkey
Thanks for the negative feedback snaf. I'm also very sorry it is not up to your standard. I only stated my opinion hence the words "I think". When you leave negative feedback, please leave a comment so I actually know why you left it rather than a stupid period.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
il Duce Primo
Fucking play the god damn game before saying it's completely not the style! It's one thing to just disrespect someone, but then you don't even support it with helpful criticism. People come here to help one another. What I see you doing is putting others down on a forum. I don't know if you have been having bad days lately, but wise up. If you truely mean to help someone, help them. Otherwise there's no reason for you to post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
il Duce Primo
If you want to help someone the last thing you ever do is put them down. What he said might have been true but you never have to say it in such a disrespecting way. Snaf didn't even follow through with any help. He has not gained any amount of knowledge from Snaf's post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Evil_Monkey
How is it the truth when he says it looks absolutely nothing like forerunner? It has some resemblance of forerunner.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
il Duce Primo
He said absolutely not. What he posted was just a simple modification of a forerunner building bungie made. And Ross, you think it vaguely resembles the structure. Open your damn eyes, he did a simple modification; how does it not look like the original?
Stop whining. I don't have to offer critique on every single piece of work. I'm free to offer my opinion, just like everyone else on the forums. You guys are like a couple of over-sensitive little girls. RELAX! Primo, you sound like a real badass.
Re: The Studio Quick-Crit Thread
The original was pretty bloody vague as it is. Without the pipes or an actual image of what it is, there's no way I would've recognised that.
Re: The Studio Quick-Crit Thread
Quote:
I don't have to offer critique on every single piece of work.
This is a quick crit thread, a place to receive criticism.
Quote:
Without the pipes or an actual image of what it is, there's no way I would've recognised that.
Its in the campaign and a multiplayer map.
Also thanks for all the -rep. Snaf you need to realise that beginners are not perfect, people actually make mistakes. You expect everyone to be at your level (if that's even anything). If its not up to your level its literally shit to you.
Re: The Studio Quick-Crit Thread
Ok, I think this should stop here - this thread has been derailed enough. We're all just going around in circles. There was nothing wrong with what SnaF said. As i've said, just because he didn't offer crit doesn't mean he doesn't have the right to post an answer to a question you openly asked to everyone on the forum.
Re: The Studio Quick-Crit Thread
He could have stated why it had no resemblance at all, that's all.
When I said it stops here I meant it; don't try and get the last word ~Timo