1650x1050 at 120 hz?

http://media.animevice.com/uploads/0...kyon_super.jpg
whatever your max res is sweetheart...

1600x1200 here bebz. I don't feel like going WS.

@chrisk123999: :fail:

I play at 1280x960 at 85hz. CRT FTW

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chrisk123999

Plus it really depends on the size of the screen and not the screen resolution. I have a laptop screen so I barley notice it.

---

So you run a 22'' screen @ 640x480? :tinfoil:

Where did you get that number from?

The screen is 13 inches.

The box says 15.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tricky

Does anyone run CE at a higher resolution 1920x1080?

---

I normally play at 5760x1200:


If you can't imagine what 640x480 would look like if it was stretched to fit that, shit on your desk and then look at it. That would be the end result.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chrisk123999

Where did you get that number from?

The screen is 13 inches.

The box says 15.

---

Did you measure it diagonally like you're supposed to with televisions and monitors? It probably is a 15.something" screen but you measured wrong.

Anyway, if you're gaming at a resolution lower than your screens native one, I feel sorry for you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chrisk123999

No, I probably wouldn't. The highest I would ever go would probably be 1024 x 768. This is Halo, it's not like it's going to somehow look much better after that screen size.

---

Uhh yeah actually, it does look a lot better at higher resolutions. It's especially true for Halo, since it doesn't have AA. The higher the resolution, the less obvious the jaggies are. Also, as already mentioned, playing a game fullscreen on an LCD at a resolution lower than it's native resolution will always look completely terrible.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chrisk123999

I don't get it. What's with people and playing games at insanely high resolutions? I have a 1280 x 800 screen and I play Halo at 640 x 480 (Because I lag when I use the scope at 800 x 600). What's the point of going above 1024 x 768?

---

You actually think 1680x1050 is an "insane" resolution? Sorry, but you're living in the past.

I agree is 1680x1050 fast becoming the norm if not being being caught up quickly by 1920×1080 due to the uptake in HD. All the monitors I use at home and at work are minimum of 1680x1050.

I think I'm at 3200x1200 or something. It's ballin.