Rob, thats like the 8th time I've seen your pic on these forums. Are you obsessed with it or did that cat really piss you off and your posting to show everyone they should hate it too?
Rob, thats like the 8th time I've seen your pic on these forums. Are you obsessed with it or did that cat really piss you off and your posting to show everyone they should hate it too?
lol, i just thought it was quite something to see. Too bad I don't have an animated version of it. It's really pretty. The colors are constantly changing in this slow hypnotic fashion. Or were, I guess. It's been in a box for a while now.
Here, have it again.
It's like so many works of art- it's tragically beautiful.
So far my new comp is running great, except I can't get it to overclock past 2.75Ghz without being unable to POST. I think someone said there is a hole in the FSB between 1500 and 1650 in this board, so I need to find out. Because people get this processor up to 3.2 Ghz easily on stock cooling without over voltage.
Its really quiet, my room vent is louder then it. But under full load the temperature in my room goes up 5-10 degrees F. It still kicks ass, card is OCed to 700 mhz core and 1720 mhz memory.
My core temps are
Core temp says
At idle its at..............................39-40 C
Underload from Prime95...............56 C
Dualcore center says
Idle.........................................34 C
And underload its.......................50 C
nice, i just dont like the screen, personally i perfer widescreen.
So do I, but I use my TV as a secondary monitor for videos, etc...
I want to get a widescreen monitor eventually, but I'm broke right now.
I want to set up multiple monitors or get a nice big one that uses dual DVI.
I hate Dell monitors, but it's big and it gets the job done. But it has a bad response rate, 35ms.
woahOriginally Posted by 4RT1LL3RY
what kind of dell monitor do you have? My dell monitor has a 6ms response rate. (16ms b-w)
Wow, my monitor has 2ms response. I thought that was a more common speed. it's samsung btw.
It says its 8ms. But in reality its 18ms, thats what it is under real-life usage according to the tomshardware.com review of them a while back.
[Edit: I over did how bad it was by a factor of 2]
Last edited by 4RT1LL3RY; October 27th, 2007 at 08:40 PM. Reason: Correcting numbers.
Ditch the stock Intel shitsink and get an actual heatsink and you'll be able to push it farther.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks