Yes, and I support the fee
Yes, but no fee
No, not up for it
Not sure at this point
Well, I think this is the best way on deciding the maps.
We pick two, you pick two and the middle map is Bloodgulch.
I know you might not like what your opponent might pick.
So if you have graphics issues with the map or you really don't know the map, we could not do it.
Go ahead and reschedule. Seems only fair since CIA allowed D2T to reschedule.
hopefully no more rescheduling after this week?
So wait, we have to reschedule?
In that case, same time next week, for now, I'm gonna check first with the other d2t's if they can come.
Oh and next time, less specs please.
Last edited by Jalpso; February 3rd, 2008 at 03:57 AM.
Fine.
Your map
Our map
BG - CTF
Our map
Your map
Does that work?
Yes, and we can even invert the order as well such as we be "our" and you be "your". I guess we can let an admin decide that.Originally Posted by king_nothing_
Our we ready to say what maps we want in order to validate them?
I'd also prefer that if there are specs, that they don't talk.Oh and next time, less specs please.
You should be using teamspeak or ventrillo anyway.
Whats that have to do with specs not talking? Im just saying specs shouldnt talk unless they are referees. I mean a lol here and there is ok, but anything beyond that is nothing necessary, its very annoying when your trying to concentrate on a match.
Thats true. Its really annoying when trying to type to an opponent on the day of the match and they don't see the message due to to much spectators typing. Also, its annoying when spectators are betraying/killing/getting killed. To much flooding chats.
Thats why when I'm a spectator, I never talk and try to keep killing/getting killed to a minimum.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks