My friend games on a 27ms (yes, that's not a typo) response time LCD, and he does it well with no complaints.
My 24" has a 5ms response time, and I can "just" notice a difference between mine and his (clone mode).
My friend games on a 27ms (yes, that's not a typo) response time LCD, and he does it well with no complaints.
My 24" has a 5ms response time, and I can "just" notice a difference between mine and his (clone mode).
pixel response time has nothing to do with input latency. Pixel response time is the measurement of how fast it takes for a pixel to change from one color to another, not how fast the signal takes to be displayed on the monitor. A faster pixel response time will get you less ghosting, but not much else.
Where the fuck is input latency listed then?
http://www.memoryexpress.com/Product...17409(ME).aspx
Get 'splaining.
It's never listed... up to you to find out what it is
Yeah, they totally pull the wool over your eyes and hope you don't notice.
Well, I have no issues what-so-ever so I don't even care.
It's odd, when I play Halo 3 on my monitor, the input lag is unbearable. But when I play Call of Duty or any other 360 game it's fine.
It's because YOU FAIL.
Probably because Halo 3 is somehow directing the Xbox to use a frame buffer of some kind.Originally Posted by JunkfoodMan
I think it has something to do with the fact that Halo runs at an artificially increased resolution.
There are currently 11 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 11 guests)
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks