Open Sauce Ideas thread

[Dwood]

I'm not going to post any of those until we know what of that is possible or impossible.

[leorimolo]

Make the netcode better by simply confirming that host said yes to every kill. I'm trying to talk about halo ce how the host has to confirm every kill to make sure there is no cheating, remove that and trust client leading to a much better netcode.

[Dwood]

Make the netcode better by simply confirming that host said yes to every kill. I'm trying to talk about halo ce how the host has to confirm every kill to make sure there is no cheating, remove that and trust client leading to a much better netcode.

I can tell you the answer to that right now.

[Hunter]

Real time shadows would be awesome.

[Kornman00]

1. This is already done, I don't understand what more is being requested
2. Possible with working networking extensions
3. Not feesible without source (NFWOS)
4. Already in Yelo
5. IDK
6. Local effect, wouldn't be that hard as long as the programmer knows their stuff
7. Would probably be a rather ugly hack if its done
8. ?
9. Explain how its limited currently.
10. NFWOS
11. Possible with working networking extensions
12. Pivot the camera? a la Halo 3?
13. IDK
14. Explain please, I don't see how this isn't possible already
15. Don't think so
16. Won't be able to play them back...
17. For the last time. No.
18. If you can figure out how to code it
19. Plenty of other 3rd party programs to do this. Compartmentalization.
20. IIRC, Xbox did this, did they not carry over in PC?
21. Already possible
22. New game engines can be registered with Yelo, however its not a setup you can just plug-and-play, so your own research would need to be done
23. Explain
24. ...
25. Explain
26. NFWOS
27. IDK
28. Possible with working networking extensions
29. NFWOS
30. What?
31. You'd realize you would also have code the affects for this right?
32. Syntax changing isn't in the scope of Yelo. As long as you compile it into the proper expression tree, you can do the syntax however you like.
33. Explain
34. ...
35. Wasn't normal maps already requested? See that question's answer
36. How many times can I say no? No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no- going to stop myself right there and end with a big NFWOS.

[klange]

Hey, I never +1'd #36, stop making me look bad

Good to hear that vehicular traversal is feasible. Maybe I'll look into it myself later...

[Dwood]

See, Korn, this thread is what I guess we could call a "bringing us back down to earth" thread. And since you practically made Open Sauce, there's no one better to do it I guess xD.

[Kornman00]

See, Korn, this thread is what I guess we could call a "bringing us back down to earth" thread.

Well then...Prepare to Drop

[Choking Victim]

And since you practically made Open Sauce...

He didn't practically make it, he made it.

[ICEE]

I think what Doan meant by enabling more FP animations was having a way to reference more than what we have. For example, if we were to enable sprinting or equipment or something of the sort, we would want to have an FP animation used.