You're actually able to break traction on those ricey little 240sx's? Don't they only have like 150hp?Originally Posted by §partan 8
You're actually able to break traction on those ricey little 240sx's? Don't they only have like 150hp?
They have more balls than your Lame-o Automatic Failstang brosef.... And more style.
I'm sorry what?
I don't prefer dumb little 4banger ricer econoboxes. I'd rather have something you can actually drift, and that has a real engine. Not all Mustangs come in automatic, by the way. I'm hoping to buy a Tremec T56 and put it in. And it's your opinion that 240sx's have more style, which I of course do not agree with. I personally think Mustangs are way cooler than the 240sx, and of course are much more manly (V8 vs 4banger, lol). I don't see why you hate Mustangs so much, were you hit by one of them or something? Mustangs were the only muscle cars that never stopped production besides Corvettes. Ford must be doing something right.
E: Oh great, here comes some huge rant on how Mustangs are terrible.
Last edited by Xetsuei; August 2nd, 2009 at 02:37 AM.
my friends have turbo. one of my frineds has 280hp and another have 350 on his 240. On the 350hp 240 you dont even have to use the ebrake, you just turn and you start to drift, and yes stock is about 160hp one he 240
My fav 240 vid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiYqY2MNM54
I'm assuming in the 350 you have to use throttle though to get it to drift it still? In my Mustang it is the same way, I actually don't ever use the e-brake when I'm drifting. The benefits of low weight on the rear end. I still cannot stand the sound of a 4banger with a fart cannon.
don't be hatin on my v6 mustang
Bah, did you just say your v6, automatic Mustang has an engine? GDIAF The Probe has more potential than your Mustang. Sell it and get a real Mustang if you want cudos from me.
Eitherway, not all cars that are 4-cylinders have a huge fart cannon on them. Hell my Talon (Which would tear the shit out of your Mustang, lawl) is so quiet you can hear the recirculated cbv dump back into the intake when you close the throttle plate under boost.
e: also 240, 280, 300, 350 pretty much all of the Nissan Z cars are far sexier than an American landbarge Mustang in terms of looks, imo, and the engines out perform or match anything with half the displacement.
guilty-e: It's a clean car you have, but in terms of performace your really cutting yourself short. I'd still sell it and go for either the pre 95 GT's or the 00-03 ones, they seem to have some balls? (I really wouldn't know)
Last edited by Kalub; August 2nd, 2009 at 02:49 AM.
HAHAHAHA. Don't make me laugh - oh wait, you already did. Do you know the best ever recorded time for a 0-60 for your Talon is 6.3 seconds? Best 1/4 mile? 14.5 seconds. It's nothing short of pathetic. I don't know what a stock 1997 GT does, but with all the upgrades mine has on it I've been getting 5.5 seconds to 60 and low 14 second 1/4 miles. And no, the Nissans may have more horsepower, but they don't have more of what actually matters - torque. The Mustangs also have their power more evenly spread out, while with the Nissans the power is almost always at the top. Mustang engines are good because they're used in fucking police cruisers, they HAVE to be good. Also the 240sx is nothing compared to a 1994-2004 Mustang in terms of looks, mainly because it's WAAAY to plain, same with your Talon. And the 2010 Mustang GT compared to the 370Z:
vs
E: The 00-04 Mustangs are exactly like mine, but with a different body. The Mustangs before the 94-04 generation are too generic looking for me.
E2: Also I forgot to mention, the engines in the Nissans also rev about 1000rpms higher than the Mustang, which increases wear and complexity of the engines which means they are likely to not last as long, or be able to take as much of a beating as Mustang engines.
Last edited by Xetsuei; August 3rd, 2009 at 12:01 AM.
Did you just accuse me of driving an automatic?!?!
No real man drives an automatic.
It's a '98 V6 manual130,000 miles >_< for 11 years old, thing is running strong
Second edit is dumb, that would make no sense an engine is designed to do something, and it usually does it if maintained properly.
Anyways, what upgrades have YOU done to yours again?
Did you know with my 1997cc 4cyl engine I put out 190-210bhp, compared to your 4,601 cc v8 that makes 215bhp. And the newer 4g63 engine that came in one of the rarer Evo's made 405.2bhp making it have the highest output per liter of any production engine.
Did you also know the 2003-2004 SVT Cobras that came with a 4.6L DOHC Superchanged v8 only made 390bhp?
I can see we have a clear winner here when it comes to American vs Import
e: No penguin, I wasn't even talkin' to you :P and I would agree, with the transmission statement
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks