And sure, I'll do it. But you still haven't shown me your car is even faster than a stock Mustang, why don't you do a 0-60 video? Afraid that your car is slower than mine?Still, get a video of you doing 0-60 and time it. I want to see this amazing machine of yours.Originally Posted by Xetsuei![]()
X: You never said the boost monitor was built into the instrument cluster and good, you FINALLY provided good reason and logic to why you're getting the other gauges. See, that wasn't hard now was it?
K: I told you fucking two pages ago why I had the guages. Are you that thick?
X: You never put it into those words, instead you insisted on acting retarded and not telling me everything.
X: And nope, to get more horsepower out of mine you don't have to do much of anything. Tune = 25 more hp, intake = 15 more hp, full exhaust = 35 more hp. There, you've gone from 215 to 290 without spending more than $500. I've had it tuned, intake, valvetrain, but I don't know how much the new valves are making the engine do but I know for sure it is more than 300hp. With a full exhaust and not being modest on the power the new valvetrain is doing, probably 350hp. And then, on top of all that, my car is STILL naturally aspirated.
K: If only, if only... Your car probably doesn't do more than 230hp. You don't get anything near those numbers from simple things like that. The most gain you would get is from the exhaust. And it probably wouldn't be more than 15-20hp.
X: And you say you know shit about cars? You're pathetic. Do you REALLY think that with a completely new valvetrain, intake, and a tune my car is doing 230hp? Not only from that can I tell you know barely anything about tuning, I can tell that you're just plain stupid.
X: No, you started this argument because you are a douchebag. I didn't do fucking anything to provoke you, I posted some pictures of my car along with a video and you come along and call it a failstang and say I have no style, as well as calling the other people with Mustang's in this thread failstangs. What the hell is wrong with you? And at least Wikipedia is for the most part reliable and has sources, unlike you. And no, I do not get ALL of my information from Wikipedia by any means. I visit many car forums as well, as well as hang out with real car tuners in RL who actually know what they're talking about.
K: I've had my hands under the hood of 3 race cars, I've rebuilt the head on my car, I've rebuilt the transmission and carb on my Dad's Pinto with his help. And, I've rebuilt the back axle of his car so it is a Posi. I know my way around cars. I've aslso helped swap 3 other engines, including two d15's or different models, and a 2.3L Merkur TurboCoupe. I know what the hell I'm talking about. I have more knowledge about cars than you do, so stop calling me out on it.
I've rode in a 11 second car, and I know what goes into them considering I helped drop the engine into it. (Not more than lowering the cherry picker, or I would have added it up there)
And I started this arguement because I think your car is LAME. Nothing more, nothing less. I wanted you to prove to me it wasn't, and I've been trying to provoke you into doing so for atleast a day now.
X: Proof? LOL. But even then, whoop de fucking do. You've driven a Talon which you think is a race car. And you think because you've rebuilt things you somehow magically know more about tuning and how much power the parts actually do? No. It just means you know how to rebuild them, good for you.
And way to flaunt your penis "HURF DURF I KNOW MORE ABOUT CARS THAN YOU". Well, you certainly haven't shown it. Instead you've acted like an arrogant douchebag.
And yes, I've rode in an 11 second car too. Does that mean you know what goes into it? No. Again, whoop de fucking do, you helped them put an engine to it. When I was 6 I helped my mom bake a cake, but I still had no idea what happened when the cake baked.
You started this argument because you're a douchebag. In all honesty, most of the cars in this thread I think are lame. But do I just go around starting random arguments? NO. Prove to you it isn't? How do I prove something to someone as thick skulled and arrogant as you?
X: Dollar for dollar invested? LOL. Now you're saying yours may not be faster but at least you got a better deal? Pathetic. Mine is still faster, and I could of done modifications and made mine WAY better than yours dollar for dollar, but I am doing those later and doing the more important mods first. And no, a stock 1997 GT convertible does 6.5 seconds stock on a 4 speed manual with 2.73 gears. You somehow thing with the mods I've done and more than a hundred horsepower more, it is somehow slower? Get real. And I didn't predict it, I went to the dragstrip on a day where they let people drag their cars and got the numbers there. And now you're accusing me of lying about the things I've done to my car? Sure I didn't install the valvetrain components MYSELF or tune it (Ford dealership did that), but I did install the airfilter. I have checked, and changed both engine oil and transmission oil. There's not much else to do with the car, it's pretty bullet proof.
K: And no, I was saying if we matched budgets, and invested dollar for dollar into our cars, mine would be faster. You really haven't done much to the car. It's practically stock. And do you have the time slip? They do hand those out, even on those days you know.
X: You're completely guessing that, because you know nothing about Mustangs and I just told you that for LESS money I can make my car be better than yours, which you can't seem to accept. And no, they did not hand out time slips.![]()
Bookmarks