Nope. I'm considering it canon. I don't consider half of the Microsoft-endorsed stuff canon.
Good point. I hadn't thought that through.
Let me put it this way: if I were to consider Halo: Reach canon at all, then I would consider this comic canon as well.
I do believe there is room to make Halo: Reach canon. All you have to do to make it fit in with the books is make it take place just a hair earlier, and remove the Pillar of Autumn being on the ground (bricks that massive can't fly, and certainly not with such tiny boosters).
I enjoyed Reach. I enjoyed Reach's story. I don't enjoy having to keep two versions of the universe wrapped up in my head because I enjoy both playing games and reading books (except anything which has the word "Bear" plastered on the cover). But I'm not going to waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah about it, like how some people waaaaaaaaaah about bloom or AAs. It's just annoying how the campaign designers and writers 'live in the moment'.
Yeah, same here. I've just put my foot down in my brain and decided that I like Nylund's version of the story better than Bungie's.
Also, bloom is not that big of a problem. I still don't understand why people are whining about it. I can understand whining about Armour Lock, but everything else about those two problems is fine.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Bookmarks