You guys remember the Gamespot article on H2V's graphics right? Anyone else think it was rather biased?
Judge for yourself.
You guys remember the Gamespot article on H2V's graphics right? Anyone else think it was rather biased?
Judge for yourself.
Last edited by Snaver; June 5th, 2007 at 08:49 PM.
old news
What?..Originally Posted by megaxp
I think you misunderstood... he made his own comparison, and a good one at that. Good job Snave.
all the images just say NO U! for me.. :-(
What's up with the "No, U!"...I can't roll over those images...
oh they DID decrease the FOV :/
I don't see the images :S
edit
Ok now I see them... but it's hard to make judgments because of the jpg compression. They need to be un-compressed .png files.
Last edited by Snowy; June 5th, 2007 at 08:33 PM.
rofl.. my bad, was messing with .htaccess :X Sorry guys, back up now.
I think H2V really only looks better when I turn AF to 16x...textures, although lo-res, look a lot less blurry. And the water looks better, and some of the building/wall textures.
Yeah, AF has to be turned on, otherwise textures will look the same 5 feet away, both on the PC and on the consoles because it will "blur". But I guess it's ok no to have it on, because I believe it's not a direct option in H2V. (You have to enable it through your graphic's control center)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks