SAPP

Hy all!

I got the source code of SAPP from Termy (the original author), so now I'm the new developer =)
Here is the brand new version, i hope you will like it ^^

http://xhalo.tk

Some new features:

• Very basic Aimbot detection
• Team Balance command (real balance, not only in player numbers ;)
• Auto Text-ban Chat Spammers
• Protection vs Spawn kills
• Vote option for players to skip the map (very basic, i just put this into the last moment, mb its a bit buggy)
• Some more new command, u can find all in the homepage :P

I tried to do my utmost best to improve SAPP, but the source code is HUGE, so pls report me any bugs that you found. Thank You!

sehé°°

How does this basic aimbot detection work?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Website

Players will get scores for "suspect" movements. If a players score is higher than the aimbot_ban value, he/she will be banned & ipbanned. =)
Note that u WON'T get banned if you are shaking your camera like a retarded or killing 15 ppl in half second, etc.
Value is between 10000 and 100000, recommended is 20000. (The less value, the faster ban)?

---

Interesting

lol so i can set the value at 5 and say everyone bots :D

for those who don't like tk links

http://xhalo.byethost18.com/

"Value is between 10000 and 100000, recommended is 20000." 5 is not between 10k and 100k ;) So no, u can't.
I fixed a mayor bug in bot detection, so if you downloaded SAPP before 19:00 GMT, i strongly recommend you to re-downlaod it again. Also, the value is now between 20k-200k.

So how specifically is this score determined?

I'd like to test trying to manually snap to different players. If I can trigger it manually, you can probably be sure that people are going to get falsely banned for apparent botting, and not being able to get unbanned because they can't prove they weren't. Nice in theory.

You think i didn't thought for this? Sure, If u can snap 120° in 0,01 second and kill the player you might get banned, otherwise its impossible... But keep trying, lemme no when u succeed ^^

Hmm, possible when it's close range. Especially when swipe noscoping, or quick reactions and luck. Is there a cool-down period, or will the score just keep adding up?

Just curious, but how did you calculate the degrees of a snap? From what I can tell, player aiming has 3 values to it. One of them definitely corresponds to up/down, but I'm not sure how the other 2 work.

Nvm, trust me, it won't ban you if you are pro, or just had a big luck. And yes, there is cool-down ofc.

Player camera has 2 values: xy(0 - 2PI)"around" and z(-PI/2 - PI/2)"up-down". SAPP checks the change of these values 100 times/sec. Snap is sqrt((xy_change*(180/PI))^2 + (z_change*(180/PI))^2)° =)

Hmm I must be looking at something different then. FYI I'm looking at the object struct.

a tiny aside here, but if youre going to post a formula like that, it would be helpful to have it in actual mathematical notation instead of the corresponding programming line. its not really an issue, its just that i find it very difficult to even process whats happening in a formula if its written in that notation

Well I managed to find the addresses in the player struct that match up to your description of xy and z aiming, but these values seem to only be updated every few seconds. If you don't mind me asking, what are the addresses that you are using?

E: I managed to find the correct addresses, so it's all good. =)

Cool =)
Donut: It was a mathematic formula, not a part of code...
sqrt = square-root , PI = PI (3,141592...), ^2 = square, xy_change and z_change are variables, they refer to the size of the xy and z coordinate change in 0,01 sec...

So your basically checking sudden changes in the view float, I'm if this happens multiple times it adds a point.

I didn't realise server had access to the viewing positions, suppose it makes sense :D

Glad we have a few more programmers here :D

^ Delta values

So the criteria for "botting" in this case is turning the camera over 120 degrees and killing someone? How do the values of 20k-200k relate?

Lol, not over 120°... uhm...sight...i'll tell u tomorrow how its exactly working, but its 2:40 am atm ... gn^^

Someone let me know when they have this running on a dedi. I'm a pretty twitchy player, so I'm curious to see if it'll falsely flag me.

So it's basically checking if the player has moved their camera direction more then a specified amount since the last check?

OK! So, as i said, its just a basic aimbot detection, yet.
Players get scores for 2 things: snap, and then kill, or kill then snap.
SAPP checks the camera change in every 0.01sec. Minimum snap is 7.5° (PI/24), the faster he kill after the snap (<= 1sec), or the faster the snap after the kill (<= 0,1 sec) the more points he get. Players get more scores for snapping after kill than snap and then kill. Also, the players get more scores for bigger snaps, this grows exponentially.
I plan advanced detection, luckily i have the source code of evilaim, so this may helps a bit. =)

Cool stuff! Looking forward to testing it. Perhaps one bot match (where everyone loads up the aimbot lol) in a private server to trial it.

The only problem I see with this method is that there are some aimbotters out there who are more careful and don't snap like crazy.

Yes i know, but as i said, its just a basic detection vs morons whos just keep holding shift w/o brain xD

lol if this does work really well looks like aimbotters will have to create bots that do slow movement lock on :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NullZero

Cool stuff! Looking forward to testing it. Perhaps one bot match (where everyone loads up the aimbot lol) in a private server to trial it.

---

We did that, it works fine.
But it doesn't always detect it when you use an aimbot, im not going in to details(because then people know how to prevent being banned)...

New version 0.11.2 has been released, its finally seems stable, even the event/say system =)
http://xhalo.tk/

Check out the new forum and post some nice ... posts. :Đ
http://www.1xgclan.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=12
Thx to {XG}Gijs007 =)

well this is the problem.
Don't worry no one has it but me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjmFUug2D78

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rainman

Don't worry no one has it but me.

---

I have one just like it, it's part of GuiltySpark.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rainman

Don't worry no one has it but me.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Youtube video

So yeah this will only be released to certain people

---

:raise:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Freelancer

I have one just like it, it's part of GuiltySpark.

---

YEAH I GOTZ AN EPENIS!

lol, it wouldn't be that hard to make a detection process for that

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kornman00

lol, it wouldn't be that hard to make a detection process for that

---

Someone really should do this. It seems like bots are easy to come by but antibot measures aren't.

yes.. i wrote smooth bot by myself too, its not hard... but i wont release it, and also very few ppl use bots like this, cuz u can't rape with it so hard, like with evilaim...
tho i'm planning advanced bot detection, but first i wanna focus in more important things like stability etc.
btw. v.1.0 will be released soon :P
oh and i think i need a pro assembly coder/debugger eheh ;) if You are it, add me on xfire; lgbalazs

Just put a Hardware BP with VEH on aiming vecs and done...that is client sided detection. Most scriptos kiddos are going to have trouble with that.

Nah, i have those already, I need u cuz i think we need to call sv_say higher than atm for the stablility, and also want to handle rcon from the beginning (i mean password checking, executing commands, etc., cuz Halo is buggy, and u can crash the server w/o knowing the password, and also no brute-force protection in it...) I already added u in messenger about a week ago tbh xD

even with the latest RC1 i think there is still a bug.
all players seems to quit all of a sudden. i have a server on GS.

Yes, i know, its bc the say command is buggy, tho it rarely even happens if u wait at least 4-5 seconds before the first join event, and leave at least 2-4
seconds between them.
But now i'm off for 5 days, use this forum for questions, bug reports, feature requests, etc.
http://www.1xgclan.com/forum/viewfor...6024888f32be2a

Byez

even with new version 1.2.1 my server still crashes (all the players seem to quit all of a sudden 'network connection lost')
i only have 4 events in my init.txt and they are 10000 12000 15000 20000.
the server kicks(network connection lost) everyone out every few hours
this is the main reason what get me frustrated everything else seems fine.
can you fix this issue.
your doing a great job.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by flamewheel06

even with new version 1.2.1 my server still crashes (all the players seem to quit all of a sudden 'network connection lost')
i only have 4 events in my init.txt and they are 10000 12000 15000 20000.
the server kicks(network connection lost) everyone out every few hours
this is the main reason what get me frustrated everything else seems fine.
can you fix this issue.
your doing a great job.

---

I have the same problem.

http://www.modacity.net/forums/showthread.php?23688-SAPP&p=590662&viewfull=1#post590662
=
SmG Cloud

Which is funny cause SmG Cloud is the biggest anti hacker... but rainman is to blame for most of the hacks.....

There is also a problem with invalid cd keys. I was able to open up modified multipule halo instances, and I could join 10 players into a realworld server with the same key, I use to be able to do these with my servers. With the new sapp, now only 1 player with the same key can join.

This disallows many players with the same key from joining and this can be fixed I'm just not sure how, but I do know it's possible.

It does also appear that sapp lags out a server after a while, it doesn't crash, it just loses connection to all other players.

Still some major props to you for developing, if it helps I would be willing to donate.

Yeah i ran it on a test server before putting it on all the servers it did not really work out stability wise. So i stuck with the old sapp for now.

I lost the copy of old sapp, do you know where to find it? Or can you zip the files over?

thanks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by POQbum

I lost the copy of old sapp, do you know where to find it? Or can you zip the files over?

thanks.

---

yeah i will 2maro i need sleep for now ill pm you on your forums.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cloud

yeah i will 2maro i need sleep for now ill pm you on your forums.

---

okay thanks man I appreciate it, I'll be waiting :p

I'll probably use it until a few more kinks (specifically, disabling the 'invalid cd key') are worked out with this version of sapp. Everything else is fantastic and wish the DEV the best. Again I would be happy to donate some money for the time and energy he has put into this project. I never thought I'd see the day of any sort of aimbot detection put into use.

I don't have halo installed anymore, but might play once to twice a month if aimbot detection worked, but honestly I think it would take 2 days to bypass it with the method I read this uses. Honestly though the bots never bothered me, it is the fact all my old halo buds do not play anymore, plus with a kid now, my halo addiction became a bit unhealthy. It would however, be a blast to play with a server full of folks with no bots, but bots are not the main problem there are many ways to cheat on halo and walls (blue arrow) are my main issue, it is worse than radar lol. I tried them all I must confess, but they made the game utterly boring, and can't imagine anyone having fun that way. Well that's more than my 2 cents. Patricks program is really cool for video making and some use it as such, even I requested the version for video. I digress, if I had the time I too would still play this old awesome game, but I am too busy making bottles and wiping up poop.

I have had a look at the source code, but for the cd key all that is used right now is some code that blocks gamespy from sending the invalid cd keys at the default port...

Looks like sehe needs an assembly coder to fix this and a few other(stability) issues.
Anyone who would like to help?

Well.. Since my last post i made lot of bug fixes and optimizations, also made mapvote function for sapp =) I know about the "network connection lost" bug, its because the unstable "sapp say" implementation. Thats why i need a good assembly debugger, Gijs already talked to Patrick, and he may can help us, witch would be awesome :D
Also i don't know what Termy did and y can more ppl join with the same key in the old version, and why can't in this new one... mb its cuz the 1.09 exe but i'm not sure.

We had a power outage 2 weeks ago and unfortunately our mysql database was lost including all posts on our forum, however we have recovered some of those posts from google cache.

Also we have a new domain name and we are working on a new website for sapp, You can access the sapp forums here https://www.xgclan.com/forum/viewfor...6024888f32be2a

The best way to send chat messages is to make the server do everything for you. Use its BuildPacket and AddPacketToQueue functions, note there are two functions that add a packet to the queue.. One is for the global queue and the other is for a player specific queue. I haven't ported my addresses for CE yet, but you can have a look at the PC 1.09 server and find a byte signatures if you want to use this code. http://pastebin.com/vstchJP4

edit: here's the disassembly this is based on, it's the server's chat processing code (again, for pc). http://pastebin.com/6hejBPZb

Byte signature should be easy to find since those assembly codes look very unique. Question is how much work should one put into this.

I already have most of the relative networking functions documented in OS

urbanyoung; this looks cool, i think i can use dis, thx :) I think the problem is that now sapp sends the server msg even if its not rdy for the queue.
edit: tho some definitions, declarations and includes are missing :/ could u give me the full code pls? or add me on xfire; lgbalazs, thx
edit2: i think i only need from this the "AddPacketToPlayerQueue" function, also i found the "FUNC_ADDPACKETTOPQUEUE" address in CE, its 0x004cc700 =)
so now i only need to know how to call this? xD i mean its, "void AddPacketToPlayerQueue(DWORD player, LPBYTE packet, DWORD packetCode, DWORD arg1, DWORD arg2, DWORD arg3, DWORD arg4, DWORD arg5)", so i should call it like this: AddPacketToPlayerQueue(player_index, message string converted to char* (??), packet code (ECX+01?), 1, 006D8D20, 00000072, NULL, NULL) (dont have better idea, found these values with odbg..)

It would be more efficient not to wrap functions in further functions. Just assign an address to a function protoype with the correct calling convention (cdecl in this case).

basically it's like he just put a "loop within a loop"

it is less efficient do what pat said.

Would it be possible to create a function to list servers on both 1.09CE and 1.00CE?
I know SmG already does this with their servers

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by POQbum

Would it be possible to create a function to list servers on both 1.09CE and 1.00CE?
I know SmG already does this with their servers

---

The Modacity servers already do that using some customized server app that is quite similar to SAPP.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Amit

The Modacity servers already do that using some customized server app that is quite similar to SAPP.

---

ah yeah I've just noticed that. Would it be possible to get this app?
/sorry off-topic

lol here's the tool SmG Clan uses

if you searched you would've found it

http://www.modacity.net/forums/showt...798-Servertool

Contact Jcap for details on its use.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by POQbum

ah yeah I've just noticed that. Would it be possible to get this app?
/sorry off-topic

---

Your looking for this: http://www.vivid-abstractions.net/pr...tom-edition-2/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by {XG}Gijs007

Your looking for this: http://www.vivid-abstractions.net/pr...tom-edition-2/

---

Thanks man. I've been searching through the release section back 8 pages and didn't see anything. I must of skipped over it

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Patrickssj6

It would be more efficient not to wrap functions in further functions. Just assign an address to a function protoype with the correct calling convention (cdecl in this case).

---

The game is a Release build, so with its optimizations, most game functions take one or more of their parameters by registers. What you're suggesting wouldn't work with them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by POQbum

Thanks man. I've been searching through the release section back 8 pages and didn't see anything. I must of skipped over it

---

Your welcome :)
This is the thread on modacity if you want to discuss it: http://www.modacity.net/forums/showt...Custom-Edition

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kornman00

The game is a Release build, so with its optimizations, most game functions take one or more of their parameters by registers. What you're suggesting wouldn't work with them.

---

Those 2 functions he posted can be perfectly be type defined. (I know this is not always the case)

I have even seen type defs with functions that require TLS.

Like kornman said, quite a few functions use registers for one or more of their parameters, it's easier to just embed the assembly call in another function. The performance difference is basically non-existent.

@sehe: That could cause the disconnects, if you bypass the queue you screw up the packet counters and they get out of sync. I used to have a proxy approach (2-3 years ago) but it was a really bad design and so I changed. Most of the relevant code is included, you should basically just need to to update the addresses. I only included the code I use for global messages (ie sv_say server messages). I just included the actual functions, didn't bother with their headers as you can just copy the declaration to one. I'll explain a bit of the code and if you still want some help, I added you on xfire and can send the whole project.

1. Update addresses, there are only three that need updating. You can make that two if you're only interested in server messages, I have the third so I can handle all chat processing.
2. Call the GlobalMessage function (ie GlobalMessage(L"your message, in wide char...")
3. The first bit of GlobalMessage is just used for variable length parameters, WFormatVarArgs is just a memory safe wrapper around _vsnwprintf_s. I'm sure you have code for doing the same thing. It lets you call the function like GlobalMessage(L"Hello %s", player).
4. The next bit just traverses the player list and sends the message to everyone in the server, (*itr)->memoryId is the player's memory id. I think other people call it their machine index or something. The game::ChatData struct is below, you may want to put byte alignment around it.

Code:

---

struct chatData
    {
        DWORD type;
        DWORD player;
        wchar_t* msg;
    };

---

If you just want sv_say functionality you can basically get rid of DispatchChat and just put the calls to BuildPacket and AddToPlayerQueue in your GlobalMessage function.

@ Patrickssj6, they probably can be type defined but I didn't really see the point.

edit: no they can't, they use registers. See lines 95/96 for BuildPacket and 127/158 for the queue functions.

Oh now I fully understand what Korn meant: There is no way of creating a function prototype since the original function "changed" through optimizations to use registers. I did know that optimization is quite smart but not that smart xD

Of course one could still inline those two assembly lines before calling the function, or am I missing something here again?

e.g.

_asm MOV EDX,0x7FF8
_asm MOV EAX,output
dwBuildPacket(..., ...)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Patrickssj6

Oh now I fully understand what Korn meant: There is no way of creating a function prototype since the original function "changed" through optimizations to use registers. I did know that optimization is quite smart but not that smart xD

Of course one could still inline those two assembly lines before calling the function, or am I missing something here again?

e.g.

_asm MOV EDX,0x7FF8
_asm MOV EAX,output
dwBuildPacket(..., ...)

---

It may work, it would depend on how the compiler builds the function call. I still don't really see why you'd want that mess every time you call the function though, especially for such an insignificant performance gain.

This is not about the performance but it does look a lot tidier.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Patrickssj6

This is not about the performance but it does look a lot tidier.

---

I guess that's just a matter of preference. I prefer it be embedded and in a file I seldom see.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Patrickssj6

This is not about the performance but it does look a lot tidier.

---

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. This is an issue of properly documenting the engine function and how you're interfacing with it. Not using inline assembly allows the compiler to add instructions of it's own. It is really unwise to mix asm blocks with C code. You leave the compiler to do pretty much whatever it wants to the resulting output asm. It's why I write explicit function wrappers in OS, and use __declspec(naked) where appropriate.

e: When interfacing with blackbox software which has no code documentation, it is far better to be explicit in your source, especially if others are suppose to look at it and/or grok what is going on.

Okay, thx the help, i'll try to put this new sv_say function like u said when i'm back from the uni. I don't need the chat cuz it works perfectly, Termy made a great job =)
Patrick; u meant call like this;
#define FUNC_ADDPACKETTOPQUEUE 0x004cc700
int ( __cdecl *Say)(int player_index, const char *msg);
Say = ( int(__cdecl*)(int, const char*) ) FUNC_ADDPACKETTOPQUEUE;
Say(player_index, "Hello");
?

Ok, that won't work. You need to build the packet before you can add it to the queue. If you look at my code I call BuildPacket and THEN AddPacketToQueue. You should use embedded calls like I did in my example, it works and is stable. The compiler won't mess anything up. All the function calls you need are already in my example. Copy and paste my BuildPacket and AddPacketToPlayerQueue functions. Once you do that and update the addresses all you need to do is change the code that is specific to Phasor to what SAPP uses.

edit: plus, remember the message needs to be utf-16 encoded, so use wchar_t* instead of char*.

OK, i'll try it now. btw. currently msg sending is works both with char* and wchar_t* in sapp.. odd. well nvm .

edit:owww... almost rdy, only need this address: ADDR_SOCKETREADY (def is missing :/) tho i guess u only have dat address in PC, so how can i find it in CE ? lol

edit2; i skipped this since its just a security function which is erase the msg if packet queue is not rdy:
//MOV ECX,DWORD PTR DS:[ADDR_SOCKETREADY]

//cmp ecx, 0
//je NOT_READY_TO_SEND
so now i can comply, but Halo crashes when i call a msg :/
the problem is that idk what to use as "(*itr)->memoryId" / "(*itr)->mem->playerNum", i used the playerindex from the PlayerTable but it seems its not good... is this a memory address wich points to the player's PlayerTable structure or what? O.o

edit3: ok, my test code witch is not working is;
void GlobalMessage(int PlayerIndex)
{

std::wstring msg = (wchar_t*)L"Test";

// Build the chat packet
chatData d;
d.type = 0;
d.player = Server->MachineInfo[PlayerIndex].Address; // Player we're sending it from
d.msg = (wchar_t*)msg.c_str();


BYTE* packetBuffer = new BYTE[4096 + 2*msg.size()];

DWORD retval = BuildPacket(packetBuffer, 0, 0x0F, 0, (LPBYTE)&d, 0, 1, 0);

AddPacketToPlayerQueue(Server->MachineInfo[PlayerIndex].PlayerNumber, packetBuffer, retval, 1, 1, 0, 1, 3);

}
and the addresses i found in 1.09 ce:

#define FUNC_BUILDPACKET 0x004d9830
#define FUNC_ADDPACKETTOQUEUE 0x004cc850
#define FUNC_ADDPACKETTOPQUEUE 0x004cc700

did i missed sth? :/

That's pretty close, the only issue i see is where you set d.Player. You should make that equal to PlayerIndex, not the player's address. So like d.player = PlayerIndex; Also, don't forget to delete packetBuffer when you're done, you don't want a memory leak.

edit: for ADDR_SOCKETREADY do a binary search for: 89 5E 18 89 1E 89 5E 08 89 5E 0C 89 5E 04 and you should end up seeing something like this http://pastebin.com/kusN1kuy

cool thx. btw i tried it with both playerindex and both memory address but neither works :/ and will it send a private server message to the player or a chat message to himself like in gand.?

edit: ok, now i used PlayerIndex in both places and tested it when only i was in the server (so PlayerIndex = PlayerNumber = MachineIndex = 0), also found that address and deleted the packetBuffer but still getting crashes when i call it:/
mb The addresses (1.09 CE) are wrong?

edit2: wooot i found & fixed the bug and now its works, cooool thx again :D

Your current code will send a message to the specific player and it will be of type all chat. If it doesn't work check your addresses are correct.

Its working now thx ^^
So no more network connection lost error, Thx to urbanyoung !
Now i only need to fix that 2 players can't join with the same cd-key :/ patched the exe with Brandinimp's patcher but that doesnt fixed it. I'll try to change a bit the hash after the player joined.

edit: FIXED! Now players with same CD-Key can join!

Version 1.5.1 is released!
Download
Don't forget to replace the exe too!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sehe

Version 1.5.1 is released!
Download
Don't forget to replace the exe too!

---

you're awesome, thanks!
For continued suggestions I'd like to ask if you could add the modification here that adds servers to both 1.09 and 1.00CE lists
Found here:
http://www.modacity.net/forums/showt...Custom-Edition

It seems I have to choose between this great sapp version or having our servers be available on both lists and it'd be great if we could have both.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by POQbum

you're awesome, thanks!
For continued suggestions I'd like to ask if you could add the modification here that adds servers to both 1.09 and 1.00CE lists
Found here:
http://www.modacity.net/forums/showt...Custom-Edition

It seems I have to choose between this great sapp version or having our servers be available on both lists and it'd be great if we could have both.

---

So it "appearing on two lists" works flawlessly for you?

You can add the anti-rcon-bruteforce into SAPP as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Patrickssj6

So it "appearing on two lists" works flawlessly for you?

You can add the anti-rcon-bruteforce into SAPP as well.

---

Yep I actually sent you a PM about that. We have a couple of our servers running with your MOD but then we can't use the newest SAPP because both of you guys have individual .exe's

They do appear on both lists and it works great, only issue (as you pointed out before) is that sometimes you don't see the server on 1.00 or 1.09, but it always comes back :p

So what I was really asking is if either of you guys (sehe or Patrickssj6) can combine these mods into 1 .exe?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Patrickssj6

You can add the anti-rcon-bruteforce into SAPP as well.

---

What, did you just add a counter for players who enter in the wrong password X times?

e: oh, didn't know there was a new thread in Releases that covered it

Sapp already has protection against known and unknown exploits.
Im pretty sure brute force is part of this -but ask sehe for confirmation anyway, also sapp normally uses its own admin system and not rcon so most servers should be fine anyway.

Also sehe told me that sapp has some kind of scripting function which gets run every x amount of sec.
He could probably make it switch between v1 and v3 every 5 sec or so and do the same as project Unify halo does.

No, it don't have rcon-brute-forec protection, yet. Tho it has 2 admin system, so u can disable rcon and don't have to worry about brute force.
About the 1.00-1.09 problem, i see this in the site u linked: "-Removed the 1.08 version and made the 1.09 version fully SAPP compatible". So whats the problem? It's not compatible with the new version of sapp? I'm not sure i can patch this exe since its originally patched by Termy and not me :/ Tho mb i can compare both exe's to an original one and then patch one...
anyway, Patrick, if u have some patcher then pls download my exe from xhalo.tk, patch it and then send me and i'll upload it, or just send me the patcher =) ty

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sehe

No, it don't have rcon-brute-forec protection, yet. Tho it has 2 admin system, so u can disable rcon and don't have to worry about brute force.
About the 1.00-1.09 problem, i see this in the site u linked: "-Removed the 1.08 version and made the 1.09 version fully SAPP compatible". So whats the problem? It's not compatible with the new version of sapp? I'm not sure i can patch this exe since its originally patched by Termy and not me :/ Tho mb i can compare both exe's to an original one and then patch one...
anyway, Patrick, if u have some patcher then pls download my exe from xhalo.tk, patch it and then send me and i'll upload it, or just send me the patcher =) ty

---

keep in mind that: Applying this on exe level would cause this to be enabled on all sapp servers, even if admins don't want it to!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by {XG}Gijs007

keep in mind that: Applying this on exe level would cause this to be enabled on all sapp servers, even if admins don't want it to!

---

Or he could provide 2 .exe's, one with and one without.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by POQbum

Or he could provide 2 .exe's, one with and one without.

---

Thats indeed possible, but it might cause for confusion.

I think its best if patrick takes the updated(25-9) haloceded.exe from the sapp project. and edit it and host it on his own blog because sapp doesn't require haloceded.exe changes that often anyway.
This case was an exception because sehe fixed the cd key issue in the exe file.

SO, whats teh problem with this 1.09 exe? Its compatible with sapp isn't it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sehe

SO, whats teh problem with this 1.09 exe? Its compatible with sapp isn't it?

---

Idk I haven't tried it in a while, but I bet it doesn't have your cd key fix;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sehe

SO, whats teh problem with this 1.09 exe? Its compatible with sapp isn't it?

---

It is sapp compatible? So I just need to have the SAPP .dll plugged in on the server?

But yes it does have the CD check which is an issue :(
I wasn't able to patch it out with brandini's patcher (2 people with the same key are not allowed in)

But if it works with your new sapp then that's great xD

10 minutes later...
>>>>
Okay so this is what I did.

I used Patrick's .exe which you said was compatible with SAPP. SAPP did not load automatically but I did patch it with termy's patcher.
After I patched it it did load sapp but it did not load any events and I could not get SAPP to produce the event_join messages.

Everything else seems to work well except that this still has the CD check which is of course an issue.

Let me know if I did something wrong in the setup :p

No, you didn't, that patcher is too old for this sapp. Well, tomorrow I'll try to patch together the 2 exes and then everything should be fine :P
btw. i heard u sent me some letter but i didn't got anything, anywhere O.o could you re send it here in a PM pls? Thx.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sehe

No, you didn't, that patcher is too old for this sapp. Well, tomorrow I'll try to patch together the 2 exes and then everything should be fine :P
btw. i heard u sent me some letter but i didn't got anything, anywhere O.o could you re send it here in a PM pls? Thx.

---

Oh I sent you a PM on your forums a while ago, don't worry about it though it was about outdated requests and concerns anyway.

I did also send patrick a PM as well but he never responded to it (even though he responded to my posts here and another thread). I was really just looking for a knowledgeable developer to combine the two so I wanted to contact both of you in hopes that one of you would say yes and do it.

Looks like you are able to do it and that's awesome. Thanks a bunch for helping out here, I'll be waiting for the release :D

I would love that release as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by homebrued

I would love that release as well.

---

I'm sure you would Addict :p
Don't worry he will probably post it up on his website.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by POQbum

Oh I sent you a PM on your forums a while ago, don't worry about it though it was about outdated requests and concerns anyway.

---

He probably didn't respond because we lost 1 month of forum activity because of a power outage-_-
Oh well we make backups of the database every hour now.

Great... The Sapp and Unify are incompatible cuz they are using the same location in the exe ... WHY?

OMFG!
Took me kinda 2h but I patched together the 2 exes, and it looks like it finally works!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sehe

Great... The Sapp and Unify are incompatible cuz they are using the same location in the exe ... WHY?

OMFG!
Took me kinda 2h but I patched together the 2 exes, and it looks like it finally works!!!

---

woot xD

let us know when you publish it