View Poll Results: What you think?

Voters
24. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, and I support the fee

    7 29.17%
  • Yes, but no fee

    15 62.50%
  • No, not up for it

    0 0%
  • Not sure at this point

    2 8.33%
Results 1 to 10 of 2104

Thread: New forum!

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    This place is just awful king_nothing_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    848

    Re: Aimbotting Debate!

    Quote Originally Posted by STLRamsFan View Post
    I've made a decision reguarding Zod and Gumby:

    Gumby:

    He'll be allowed to compete. While he did bot, it was a year ago and I do believe he has proven himself. Plus, if he does bot he'll be caught and punished reguardless. While I do believe in 0 tolerance, I do believe in one thing. If you get a new hash and prove yourself then you'll partly forgiven. But as like the Scarlet Letter, you'll have a mark on you. I would have never known that Gumby had botted had it not been for Mal.
    Therefor, Gumby will be allowed to compete. Unless you all believe we should put this up for a vote as I'm allowing Zod.

    As I say, if you agree then it's all good.
    Just for the record, it wasn't a year ago when he was caught botting, it was this past February.

    And honestly, I don't get why someone should get a second chance simply because they went and got a new CD key (two new ones in Gumby's case). I really just don't see the logic in that. If you're going to allow him to play you might as well allow every person on our list of botters to play...
    Last edited by king_nothing_; October 22nd, 2007 at 12:31 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •