Well to be positive I like that missile/mini-nuke-thing. As far as using a nuclear projectile to take down a aircraft, well lets be honest, isn't that a bit just a little tiny bit overkill? I mean if your just that damn determined to take down that plane then by all means go for it.
Just saying.
You should make this a hand held rocket launcher, with some kind of special awesome missile that goes in it. Because it looks like the launcher it's self is already something that can be hand held.
Well if you have got a bloody terrorist attacking then its best to completely obliterate it than nothing lol
Its actually too big to be hand held, and it isnt just going to stay flat(the barrel) its going to have a mech on the end possibly electrically operated for aiming the missile and for locking on, it will all be done via a computer, so its more of a computerised missile launcher.
One, yes. A whole massed formation of strategic bombers?Originally Posted by FlyingStone
Yeah thought about that when I was posting but why would they be grouped so close together? Though would be epic, BOOM MUTHA FUDA, 34 KILLS WHAT NOW HUH?
Nukes have a pretty huge blast radius, and the whole point of tight formations is to concentrate defensive firepower, damage to the target, and crew morale...
Who gave Bush a computer >_>.
Ross when was the last time you saw a bomber squadron of more then two - three planes.
The Cold War, but that's not to say it's totally impossible and will never ever happen again
I mean, this could even be for some kind of alternate Cold War/WWII universe really
Lmao
would serve better as an EMP weapon than a nuke tbh.
EMP whats 1 of them?
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks