Quick-Crit 2008-2009

[Advancebo]

I see error :V

[Heathen]

Working on some forerunner generator arrays.
So far i have this.
Any advice on what to add/remove be greatly appreciated.

That looks really great.

[killer9856]

Yeah, check up some of those angles though, they look a bit off. Especially that one extrude inward in the first picture. It looks funny. Other than that, a nice piece of forerunner it has become.

[Chainsy]

Jesus, the horrific memories that brings back.... fucking library.

[Mass]

Working on some forerunner generator arrays.
So far i have this.
Any advice on what to add/remove be greatly appreciated.

Your angles are all wrong, you have to make sure they are 45's and 60's otherwise it will look funky (like it does now.)

The basic shape is ok, but there should be more than just chamfers, insets, and extrusions.

[Rentafence]

Your angles are all wrong, you have to make sure they are 45's and 60's otherwise it will look funky (like it does now.)

Uh, no. Where is it written in stone that forerunner geometry has to have 45 and 60 degree angles? It looks fine as is.

[SnaFuBAR]

Uh, no. Where is it written in stone that forerunner geometry has to have 45 and 60 degree angles? It looks fine as is.

It's not "written" but if you observe the design language of forerunner architecture, you will see that yes, it employs 60, 45, 30 and 15 degree angles.

[Heathen]

It's not "written" but if you observe the design language of forerunner architecture, you will see that yes, it employs 60, 45, 30 and 15 degree angles.

Hm..and here I thought snaf would agree with me on this one.

I think this is hella fine forerunner. Srsly.

[Bastinka]

Am I the only one noticing the error in the geometry/smoothing in the center of that object?..

[Limited]

Am I the only one noticing the error in the geometry/smoothing in the center of that object?..

I saw it, but thought my screen was dirty lol.