go away
You know what I mean, excessive or even 'modern' railing just doesn't fit with the Halo universe. The one weapon in the entire trilogy which has a rail only has a small one which lies flush with the top of the handle; it doesn't appear to be spaced at all, and it's integrated into the rifle the way a G36's handle rails are. It's simply an attachment point for optics, and that's it, much the same way the MP5 has attachment points to accept HK mounts or AKs have a dovetail to accept PSOs, Kobras and such. Full-length spaced rails like you'd see on an M4 have no place in Halo at all, they look wrong. You're usually the one to bring up consistency with the design language of something; the only rails that belong in Halo are minor attachment points like that on the BR, not full-length 1913-like rails, especially if there's no call for them in the first place (such as on the shotgun).
As for boring, rails are boring unless something is covering them. I don't know about you, but long stretches of repeating shapes do nothing for me. Would it really kill people to think of a better way of making something look more detailed, or maybe even - going out on a limb here - coming up with some original attachment systems? That'd fit better and look better, I think.
At the end of the day it's not my choice to make, I just think that for a sci-fi game of Halo's calibre, you really should either scrap them or figure out a new system that doesn't look so bland and boxy. Perhaps a non-spaced, low-profile rail where the sight ridge is (or even on the sight ridge itself, so it serves a purpose other than elevating the sights from the magazine a little).
The rear sights look pretty sick, I'll pay that.
Bookmarks