HAHAHAHA. Don't make me laugh - oh wait, you already did. Do you know the best ever recorded time for a 0-60 for your Talon is 6.3 seconds? Best 1/4 mile? 14.5 seconds. It's nothing short of pathetic. I don't know what a stock 1997 GT does, but with all the upgrades mine has on it I've been getting 5.5 seconds to 60 and low 14 second 1/4 miles. And no, the Nissans may have more horsepower, but they don't have more of what actually matters - torque. The Mustangs also have their power more evenly spread out, while with the Nissans the power is almost always at the top. Mustang engines are good because they're used in fucking police cruisers, they HAVE to be good. Also the 240sx is nothing compared to a 1994-2004 Mustang in terms of looks, mainly because it's WAAAY to plain, same with your Talon. And the 2010 Mustang GT compared to the 370Z:
vs
E: The 00-04 Mustangs are exactly like mine, but with a different body. The Mustangs before the 94-04 generation are too generic looking for me.
E2: Also I forgot to mention, the engines in the Nissans also rev about 1000rpms higher than the Mustang, which increases wear and complexity of the engines which means they are likely to not last as long, or be able to take as much of a beating as Mustang engines.
Bookmarks