Printable View
Battle rifle unwrap.
The picture that I supplied was a preview. There was a reason why I posted it here for crit. But there is no reason for you to say a "I am more experienced then you" comment. That sky was thrown away once I found no map it would look good in.Quote:
Originally Posted by Masterz1337
That unwrap is pretty terrible dude. As with all your others, you are not utilizing your space right.
How is that? I took the FP camera into consideration. Making objects that show up more in FP and FP animations have more detail. Also the way disaster textures the guns requires some good space for edge bleeding.
Look at your very small items. Don't you think you would do much better my moving them elsewhere, making them larger, and, by moving them elsewhere, you'd give other parts more space for edge bleeding?
You need to think out your space usage more. It's better than some of your earlier ones, those were pretty much garbage, but this one still isn't good.
Please stop telling us that you made the pats you see more larger. Pesonally I dont care, I would like all the parts equal size so the whole weapon can be detailed.
I believe he uses some sort of an automatic unwrapper in all his uv's as opposed to unwrapping them manually. That's what I heard at least.Quote:
Originally Posted by SnaFuBAR
"Phew. My hands are tired after this. Battle rifle unwrap. Took a while to do this." - DEEhunter on halomaps
must've been pretty tiring clicking that unwrap button there.
If you're not using a program, then w/e it's not like I care. I'm just going by past claims from your "friends".
So let me get this straight, you posted a picture of your skybox, you wanted crit, I tell you you aren't doing them right, you tell me to fuck off, I tell you i'm trying to help, because i know what i'm talking about, you say other people say it's fine, and I say I know what I'm talking about better than them through expierence, and now your taking offense?Quote:
Originally Posted by DEEhunterBattle rifle unwrap.
The picture that I supplied was a preview. There was a reason why I posted it here for crit. But there is no reason for you to say a "I am more experienced then you" comment. That sky was thrown away once I found no map it would look good in.
Either except crit when you ask for it or Get the fuck off these forums.
Do you do anything your self Dee? Or do you steal credit for EVERYTHING?
When the hell did I steal credit?Quote:
Originally Posted by Hunter
Im sure you were talking to disaster since he was the only one I told about unwrella recently. No I did not use that and I showed disaster about the tool when he linked me to the Packer that they had.Quote:
Originally Posted by Choking Victim
I'm saying that it does not require crit anymore because its old and is unused now. I respect the crit your giving it but you came up a little late for it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Masterz1337
Actually, no, I just typed in "3ds max automatic unwrapper" into google and that's the first thing that came up. It's sheer luck that that's the one you use tbh.Quote:
Originally Posted by DEEhunter
I don't use any automatic unwrapper.Quote:
Originally Posted by Choking Victim
That's not the message you portrayed.Quote:
Originally Posted by DEEhunter
I was telling disaster that I was getting private beta's for the UV packer since one of the coders was at facepunch and invited me to it. After he showed me that I told him about unwrella. There was no beta for it was me and diaster were surprised at the results but he was disappointed about the poly limit for the trial because HE wanted to use it. When I told him about it I was telling him that unwrella uses the same packing engine as the one he showed me. I never used it and I never will use any automatic unwrapping tool.
Lol, :fail:
You use something to make skies, particle things, and unwrap?
Bhaha.
I use a Vue for skies and Headus for unwrapping. I do particles in 3ds max.
Lol, and what do you use to make those things in your sig?
My sig rotates. Be specific.
>.>
the weird designs.
http://deelekgolo.deviantart.com/art/Nova-95572685
These are fractals. I make them using apophysis.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DEEhunter
wut?Quote:
Originally Posted by DEEhunter
Headus isnt an automatic unwrapper.
Headus isn't automatic unwrapping. It has more tools than 3ds max to unwrap. You still have to unwrap it by setting up seams and packing. It doesn't do it automatically.
Ah, was trying to look into what exactly it was.
Edit: found it, Headus UVlayout.
More infoQuote:
UVLayout, developed by headus, is a stand-alone application for the creation and editing of UV coordinates for 3D polymeshes and subdivision surfaces. Used by professionals in the games and visual effects industries, by hobbyists of all ilks and by students, UVLayout's unique approach gives texture artists the tools to produce high quality low distortion UVs in significantly less time than they would by traditional methods.
I dont think it is automatic. (In Dees defence)
Your late.
Then why post it, if you weren't looking for crit in the gallery thread? It's only a few days old. And what have you changed about it since then, if it's old and outdated?Quote:
Originally Posted by DEEhunter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heathen
from an old PM about his skies.Quote:
http://www.e-onsoftware.com/products/vue/vue_6_xstream/
To make the general sky dome.
http://www.outerspace-software.com/bixorama.html
To quickly convert the panorama into a cubemap and so forth.
And photoshop for making the general adjustments and to put in some extra things into the sky dome. If you need any help on making it then just ask.
__________________
I asked for crit back then but no one bothered so I moved on. I had different projects going on back then because I had to crunch work in before finals. Then nearly 15 days later you gave it crit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Masterz1337
Masterz is pretty experienced with Halo, take his crit nicly.
Still, I like his shit so idc.
Saying "You still don't get how halo skies are done do you?" Does not really help.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hunter
Ask him what he means.
He was referring to when he told you before.
I'm just saying, everything appears to be in quads, so one can assume that its an accurate estimation. Even if there are a few stray verts, it will at least be close, but not exact. You know what I meant, so stop trying to be right all the time.Quote:
Originally Posted by SnaFuBAR
E: didnt realize new page.
Well, CV told you once in great detail, it's not like you don't know or weren't told.Quote:
Originally Posted by DEEhunter
hmmmm.... No.Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndogman
So he should try to be wrong? what?Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndogman
Made this for the hell of it.
http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/5122/redbulbff0.gif
Trying some forerunner crap.
http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/3809/mapidea1.jpg
Inside the bases:
http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/371...ikeatounge.jpg
Gonna be honest, that doesn't look very forerunner to me. Of course, every forerunner map I've made has wound up in my "random crap" scenes in my 3ds max folders.
I went down a dimension.
Good thing you wrote that, because otherwise I would not have been able to tell.
That sounds like sarcasm, but it's not. You drew a squiggly box...
wtf is that? a stone thing pointing at the midnight sky or over view of a land mass and its shoreline? or a cliff viewed from the bottom with a rocky ledge jutting out?
I don't get it either Dee. :|
I hope you guys know he's just being an idiot and is not being serious.
I'm trying...
In br chains.
Is it a plane?
Mind explaining this?Quote:
Originally Posted by DEEhunter
BOY.
draw from life.
also. keep practicing.
Your the official forum troll.Quote:
Originally Posted by sKc_Chains
Quote:
Originally Posted by bapsi
This and I sense Dee is just trying to make fun of chains.
If you are Dee, I thought you were ALITTLE more mature about things then this. :|
Don't make me give out infractions in this thread. Dee and Chains, quit your shit; I don't care who started it.
Wait, what, he was making fun of me?
Seems like a little too much effort to troll someone, at least for me anyways.
moooving on...
whoa what's the dealio about people quoting me i'm lost.
Decent material, but from a modelling standpoint that's extremely basic.
Dee doesnt model, he focuses on pretty renders.
Hunter doesnt model. He makes things with horrible topology.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hunter
I was originally trying to make a bubble shield. The actual object is very low poly. But then I tried using the height map as the displacement map and had some good results. But I ended up using it in unreal to have some fun with physics.
That was uncalled for, you don't model, all you do is show pretty renders, he even complimented the renders of being pretty. Hunter can model fine.
Yes, he was making pictures with very little effort and terrible perspective.Quote:
Originally Posted by sKc_Chains
Pictures that he has to explain to be understood what the subject matter is.
Honestly very cool.Quote:
Originally Posted by DEEhunter
Simplicity isn't always a -
Some parts look like Play-DohQuote:
Originally Posted by DEEhunter
Meh, oh well, his loss of time, not mine. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Heathen
The texture noticeably tiles and there's the matter of the random pentagons. And the lowered part that should be black under the red hexagons is red. Lazy recolouring.
Random pentagons? You cannot have a hexagon sphere without pentagons in it. Also the extrusion of the shapes isnt really supposed to be, so the skin wasnt made for it. I tried using the heightmap made in znormal as a displacement map and it made it look like that. Here is how it was originally supposed to look with normal maps.Quote:
Originally Posted by flyinrooster
http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/9908/normalmeps.jpg
Didn't know that. What I do know is that you completely ignored the rest of my post.
Wtf you stupid prick. I was fucking suporting you by saying that the image wasnt meant to be a good model, but a good render. And why dont you write topology on a peice of paper and choke to death on it, Im sick of seeing the fucking word.
:lmao:! He probably took your statement as an insult saying he didnt model and so he instinctivley responded negativley, and put one of your cons against you?
http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/9655/derp.jpg
Practicing Life drawing.
The mouse looks flat on the top.
E: ignore the green table lines. I messed up with that. :(
I get the mouse proportion but what is the black squiggle?
That is showing where you put the line. You got the angle wrong on it.
keep workin hard.
emphasisQuote:
Originally Posted by bapsi
emphassisQuote:
Originally Posted by Heathen
That's a pokémon!
Also, I had the strangest dream that you did lightmaps for one of my maps =o
Maybe that means something. :OQuote:
Originally Posted by L0d3x
Updated.
http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/9708/wip4.png
Double post.
around the glow looks odd. and scratches looks like speed blur. nice mesh =D
that looks alot like the real deal (as real as the deal gets anyways). still think the scratches(or that's what it seems to me) look like motion blur.
I'm pretty sure that's because its not scratches, its just brushed metal. That's why it looks like motion blur, because that's the most common way of doing brushed metal in photoshop. (afaik)
What are you looking for crit on? Or are you even looking for crit? lol
Looks really cool Dee.
If thats in CE, lightmaps. If its a render, the materials, lighting, and water.
I doubt its Halo, just look at the water.
I dno, is it a show off of where the water hits the skybox horizon?
Emit your opinions.
You didnt get my good side...
http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/4876/rendertits.png
Rendertits.jpg
Looks nice.Quote:
Originally Posted by DEEhunter
Tried making forerunner textures and failed horribly at it. Took the easy way out.:saddowns:
http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/4003/renderfuck.png
Too shiny, especially since sand has been being blown onto it for years and years.
For a second it reminded me of that skyscraper course in Mario Kart 64's battle mode, lol.
i like the lighting on the metal parts.
i agree with ODX on his criticism on the boulder and sand. could be a little duller and more believable.
